Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 7 | — |
| Target share | 6.1% | — |
| Catch rate | 71.4% | — |
| Success rate per target | 71.4% | — |
| Yards per target | 5.0 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 14.3% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 2 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 3 | — |
Charting
Where Barbour's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted8 targets charted
Game Log
Ethan Barbour's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Tennessee State | W 63–3 | 5.1 | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 0 | 10 |
| 2 |  Western Kentucky | W 70–20 | 6.3 | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 1 | 7 |
| 3 | @ Arkansas | W 45–17 | 4.0 | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 5 |
| 4 |  Oklahoma | W 41–13 | 3.2 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 |
| 5 |  Vanderbilt | W 38–14 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 6 | @ Alabama | W 20–17 | 5.1 | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 0 | 10 |
| 7 |  Auburn | L 24–27 | 4.0 | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 5 |
| 9 | vs Florida | W 27–8 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2026 · 6 games | 4.6 | 6 | 40 | 6.7 | 1 | 10 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 6 | 1004th / 2089 |
| Yards | 40 | 1239th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 6.7 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 412th / 914 |
| Long | 10 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Tennessee State | ✓ TE | 59 | ~29 (13–41) | 3 | · | 49% |
| Wk 2 · Western Kentucky | ✓ TE | 60 | ~29 (13–41) | 1 | · | 48% |
| Wk 3 · Arkansas | — | 63 | ~25 (12–36) | 1 | · | 40% |
| Wk 4 · Oklahoma | — | 52 | ~17 (8–24) | 1 | · | 33% |
| Wk 6 · Alabama | — | 61 | ~13 (6–20) | 1 | 1 | 21% |
| Wk 7 · Auburn | — | 65 | ~26 (12–37) | 1 | · | 40% |
| Season | 2 GS | 491 | 139 (106–194) | 8 | 1 | 28% |
Position Room
9 TEs on the Georgia roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Lawson Luckie | TE | SR | 12 | 197 | 2 | 7% | +1.12 |
| 23 | Jaden Reddell | TE | JR | 8 | 130 | 1 | 8% | +0.76 |
| Elyiss Williams | TE | 7 | 88 | 2 | 5% | +0.56 | ||
| 9 | Ethan Barbour | TE | SO | 6 | 40 | 1 | 5% | +0.36 |
| 80 | Kaiden Prothro | TE | FR | 1 | 16 | 1 | 3% | +0.82 |
| 41 | David Lalaian | TE | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 82 | Colton Heinrich | TE | JR | — | — | — | 3% | -1.39 |
| 87 | Lincoln Keyes | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 88 | Brayden Fogle | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Georgia depth chart →