Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 49 | — |
| Success rate | 44.9% | 168th / 332 |
| Explosive run rate | 12.2% | 190th / 332 |
| Stuffed at the line | 16.3% | 187th / 332 |
| First downs | 13 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 11 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 1 | — |
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 8 | — |
| Target share | 9.1% | — |
| Catch rate | 75.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 37.5% | — |
| Yards per target | 4.0 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 2 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 0 | — |
Charting
Where Jr.'s plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted8 targets charted
Run direction52 carries
Game Log
Jason Collins Jr.'s box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Rushing | Receiving | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Florida International | W 19–9 | 4.8 | 17 | 59 | 3.5 | 0 | 12 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 2 | @ Army | W 28–24 | 5.2 | 9 | 40 | 4.4 | 0 | 10 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 3 |  Delaware State | W 59–17 | 6.2 | 5 | 35 | 7.0 | 1 | 11 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 4 | @ Bowling Green | W 14–6 | — | 2 | 8 | 4.0 | 0 | 9 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 5 |  Temple | L 13–17 | 5.8 | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 0 | 21 | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 0 | 7 |
| 6 | @ UTSA | L 24–31 | 5.5 | 4 | 17 | 4.3 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 14 | 14.0 | 0 | 14 |
| 7 |  Kent State | W 29–2 | 6.2 | 6 | 40 | 6.7 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 12 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 |
| 9 |  UAB | W 30–10 | 5.5 | 5 | 15 | 3.0 | 1 | 6 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 2026 · 8 games | 5.6 | 52 | 244 | 4.7 | 2 | 21 | 6 | 32 | 5.3 | 0 | 14 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 52 | — |
| Yards | 244 | 285th / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | 4.7 | 157th / 312 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 266th / 683 |
| Long | 21 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 6 | 1004th / 2089 |
| Yards | 32 | 1336th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 5.3 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 14 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Florida International | ✓ RB | 56 | ~31 (21–40) | 17 | 55% |
| Wk 2 · Army | ✓ RB | 55 | ~25 (17–32) | 9 | 45% |
| Wk 3 · Delaware State | — | 66 | ~15 (10–19) | 5 | 23% |
| Wk 4 · Bowling Green | — | 52 | ~8 (2–16) | 2 | 15% |
| Wk 5 · Temple | — | 66 | ~16 (11–21) | 6 | 24% |
| Wk 6 · UTSA | — | 61 | ~18 (12–23) | 7 | 30% |
| Wk 7 · Kent State | — | 59 | ~25 (17–32) | 9 | 42% |
| Wk 9 · UAB | — | 55 | ~12 (3–23) | 5 | 22% |
| Season | 2 GS | 470 | 150 (119–185) | 60 | 32% |
Position Room
7 RBs on the South Florida roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | D.J. Crowther | RB | SR | 121 | 578 | 4.8 | 7 | 9 | +0.16 |
| 2 | Jason Collins Jr. | RB | JR | 52 | 244 | 4.7 | 2 | 6 | +0.13 |
| 15 | Alvon Isaac | RB | SO | 5 | 24 | 4.8 | 0 | 2 | +0.14 |
| 24 | Tray Kinkle | RB | SO | 5 | 67 | 13.4 | 0 | — | +0.78 |
| 22 | Chase Garnett | RB | FR | 1 | 45 | 45 | 1 | — | +3.48 |
| 25 | Jayson Franklin | RB | FR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | Connor Mathews | RB | FR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. South Florida depth chart →