Snap share
70%
3 of 3 started · likely 59–84%
Receptions
5
500th of 1676 in FBS
Rec. yards
36
782nd of 1662 in FBS
Yards / catch
7.2
Rec. TD
0

Advanced

Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume

ReceivingValueFBS rank
Targets5—
Target share7.0%—
Catch rate80.0%—
Success rate per target40.0%—
Yards per target6.4—
Explosive catches0.0%—
Deep-target rate20.0%—
3rd-down targets0—
Red-zone targets0—

2026 Season Stats

FBS rank among qualifying players

Receiving2026FBS rank
Receptions5500th / 1676
Yards36782nd / 1662
Yards / catch7.2—
Touchdowns0—
Long15—

Snaps by Game

Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works

GameStartTeam playsEst. snapsPlays involvedPenaltiesSnap share
Wk 1 · Alabama✓ TE41~32 (15–41)2·78%
Wk 2 · App State✓ TE73~42 (36–51)1158%
Wk 3 · Old Dominion✓ TE68~53 (45–64)3·78%
Season3 GS182127 (108–153)6170%

Position Room

7 TEs on the East Carolina roster, ordered by rec

#PlayerPosClassRecYdsTDTgt shareEPA/play
Ismael Smith FloresTE5360——
6Kanen HamlettTESR110——
25Stephen CollierTESO—————
45Mason BrownTESR—————
82Gage RealeTESR—————
86Kaleb MorrowTESO—————
89Jacob HollandTEFR—————

Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. East Carolina depth chart →