Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 85 | — |
| Success rate | 32.9% | 314th / 332 |
| Explosive run rate | 4.7% | 317th / 332 |
| Stuffed at the line | 17.6% | 222nd / 332 |
| First downs | 15 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 16 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 1 | — |
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 9 | — |
| Target share | 8.0% | — |
| Catch rate | 88.9% | — |
| Success rate per target | 33.3% | — |
| Yards per target | 7.2 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 2 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 0 | — |
Charting
Where Hiter's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted7 targets charted
Run direction85 carries
Game Log
Savion Hiter's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Rushing | Receiving | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Western Michigan | W 13–12 | 4.2 | 5 | 15 | 3.0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 |  Oklahoma | W 17–10 | 5.9 | 8 | 6 | 0.8 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 0 | 19 |
| 3 |  UTEP | W 52–17 | 5.9 | 11 | 62 | 5.6 | 2 | 15 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 4 |  Iowa | L 19–20 | 6.0 | 14 | 53 | 3.8 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 19 | 19.0 | 0 | 19 |
| 5 | @ Minnesota | L 14–20 | 2.5 | 8 | 9 | 1.1 | 0 | 5 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 7 |  Penn State | W 21–18 | 6.6 | 11 | 78 | 7.1 | 0 | 41 | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 2 |
| 8 |  Indiana | L 6–13 | 2.5 | 10 | 15 | 1.5 | 0 | 5 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 9 | @ Rutgers | W 28–21 | 5.6 | 20 | 76 | 3.8 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 |
| 2026 · 8 games | 4.9 | 87 | 314 | 3.6 | 2 | 41 | 8 | 65 | 8.1 | 0 | 19 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 87 | — |
| Yards | 314 | 209th / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | 3.6 | 259th / 312 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 266th / 683 |
| Long | 41 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 8 | 841st / 2089 |
| Yards | 65 | 1010th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 8.1 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 19 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 2 | — |
| Lost | 1 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Western Michigan | 48 | ~17 (12–22) | 6 | 35% |
| Wk 2 · Oklahoma | 58 | ~24 (16–31) | 11 | 41% |
| Wk 3 · UTEP | 70 | ~26 (18–34) | 11 | 37% |
| Wk 4 · Iowa | 68 | ~35 (24–45) | 15 | 51% |
| Wk 5 · Minnesota | 49 | ~21 (14–27) | 8 | 43% |
| Wk 7 · Penn State | 53 | ~26 (18–34) | 14 | 49% |
| Wk 8 · Indiana | 74 | ~27 (18–35) | 10 | 36% |
| Wk 9 · Rutgers | 73 | ~44 (37–49) | 21 | 60% |
| Season | 493 | 220 (174–272) | 96 | 45% |
Position Room
7 RBs on the Michigan roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Savion Hiter | RB | FR | 87 | 314 | 3.6 | 2 | 8 | -0.02 |
| 23 | Jordan Marshall | RB | JR | 86 | 319 | 3.7 | 5 | 5 | +0.12 |
| 24 | Bryson Kuzdzal | RB | SR | 21 | 117 | 5.6 | 1 | 1 | +0.18 |
| 26 | Donovan Johnson | RB | SO | 1 | -2 | -2 | 0 | — | -0.89 |
| 36 | Tomas O'Meara | RB | JR | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | — | +0.04 |
| 25 | Micah Ka'apana | RB | JR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | Jonathan Brown | RB | FR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. Michigan depth chart →