Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 12 | — |
| Target share | 6.2% | — |
| Catch rate | 91.7% | — |
| Success rate per target | 66.7% | — |
| Yards per target | 10.8 | — |
| Explosive catches | 8.3% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 3 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 4 | — |
Charting
Where O'Callaghan's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted12 targets charted
Game Log
Aidan O'Callaghan's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ UNLV | W 27–21 | 4.0 | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 5 |
| 1 |  Arkansas State | W 42–24 | 6.3 | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 1 | 7 |
| 2 | @ Boise State | L 20–38 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 3 |  UT Martin | W 45–21 | 6.3 | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 0 | 14 |
| 5 | @ Charlotte | W 59–8 | 4.7 | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 8 |
| 6 |  UAB | W 38–13 | 7.6 | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 1 | 13 |
| 7 | @ Tulane | L 17–31 | 4.3 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 |
| 8 |  East Carolina | W 41–34 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 9 |  Army | W 49–22 | 7.1 | 1 | 46 | 46.0 | 0 | 46 |
| 2026 · 7 games | 5.8 | 11 | 130 | 11.8 | 2 | 46 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 11 | 650th / 2089 |
| Yards | 130 | 630th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 11.8 | — |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 223rd / 914 |
| Long | 46 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · UNLV | — | 59 | ~20 (9–29) | 1 | 34% |
| Wk 1 · Arkansas State | — | 63 | ~25 (12–36) | 1 | 40% |
| Wk 3 · UT Martin | ✓ TE | 75 | ~41 (35–50) | 3 | 55% |
| Wk 5 · Charlotte | — | 89 | ~26 (12–37) | 1 | 29% |
| Wk 6 · UAB | — | 66 | ~32 (15–46) | 3 | 48% |
| Wk 7 · Tulane | — | 81 | ~33 (15–47) | 2 | 41% |
| Wk 9 · Army | — | 75 | ~16 (7–23) | 1 | 21% |
| Season | 1 GS | 640 | 193 (148–269) | 12 | 30% |
Position Room
6 TEs on the Memphis roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Hunter Tipton | TE | SR | 35 | 495 | 5 | 17% | +0.63 |
| 14 | Aidan O'Callaghan | TE | SO | 11 | 130 | 2 | 6% | +1.04 |
| 86 | Jonathan Harding | TE | FR | 2 | 14 | 1 | 4% | +0.68 |
| 10 | TJ Johnson | TE | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 81 | Marshall Smith Jr. | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 87 | Garrett Essner | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Memphis depth chart →