Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 7 | — |
| Target share | 4.8% | — |
| Catch rate | 71.4% | — |
| Success rate per target | 57.1% | — |
| Yards per target | 7.9 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 1 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 2 | — |
Charting
Where Miller's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted7 targets charted
Game Log
AJ Miller's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ Nebraska | L 21–49 | 5.8 | 2 | 18 | 9.0 | 0 | 14 |
| 2 |  Jacksonville State | W 29–27 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 3 | @ South Alabama | L 36–41 | 6.5 | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 1 | 10 |
| 4 |  Stonehill | W 35–7 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 5 | @ Kent State | W 13–10 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 6 |  Central Michigan | W 31–14 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 7 | @ Sacramento State | W 48–7 | 4.7 | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 8 |
| 8 |  Eastern Michigan | W 24–20 | 5.8 | 1 | 19 | 19.0 | 0 | 19 |
| 2026 · 4 games | 5.7 | 5 | 55 | 11.0 | 1 | 19 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 5 | 1122nd / 2089 |
| Yards | 55 | 1104th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 11 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 412th / 914 |
| Long | 19 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Nebraska | ✓ TE | 65 | ~41 (35–50) | 2 | 63% |
| Wk 2 · Jacksonville State | ✓ TE | 66 | ~19 (9–27) | 1 | 29% |
| Wk 3 · South Alabama | — | 59 | ~17 (8–24) | 1 | 29% |
| Wk 4 · Stonehill | ✓ TE | 71 | ~15 (7–21) | 1 | 21% |
| Wk 7 · Sacramento State | ✓ TE | 64 | ~26 (12–37) | 1 | 41% |
| Wk 8 · Eastern Michigan | — | 55 | ~16 (7–23) | 1 | 29% |
| Season | 4 GS | 502 | 134 (103–187) | 7 | 27% |
Position Room
7 TEs on the Ohio roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33 | Jake Furtney | TE | SO | 13 | 128 | 0 | 12% | +0.23 |
| 84 | AJ Miller | TE | SO | 5 | 55 | 1 | 4% | +0.07 |
| 85 | Riley Palmeter | TE | SR | 5 | 61 | 0 | 4% | -1.03 |
| 86 | Andrew Metzger | TE | SO | 4 | 30 | 0 | 4% | +0.24 |
| 44 | Aiden Lowery | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 82 | Calvin Moody | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 87 | Tim Boals | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Ohio depth chart →