Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 59 | — |
| Target share | 30.7% | 17th / 534 |
| Catch rate | 66.1% | 234th / 534 |
| Success rate per target | 47.5% | 282nd / 534 |
| Yards per target | 6.1 | 434th / 534 |
| Explosive catches | 6.8% | 409th / 534 |
| Deep-target rate | 15.3% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 15 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 4 | — |
Charting
Where Marsh's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted45 targets charted
2025 charting · Michigan
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (5 of Marsh’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted30 targets charted
Career
2 seasons since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Michigan#37 · 5-3 | 8 | 84% | 39 | 360 | 1 | 30.7% |
| 2025 | Michigan#26 · 9-4 | 12 | 56% | 45 | 651 | 4 | 21.5% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Andrew Marsh's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Andrew Marsh's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | Returns | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long | KR | KR yds | PR | PR yds | TD |
| 1 |  Western Michigan | W 13–12 | 1.7 | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 0 | 11 | · | · | 2 | 9 | · |
| 2 |  Oklahoma | W 17–10 | 5.7 | 3 | 13 | 4.3 | 0 | 12 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 3 |  UTEP | W 52–17 | 8.4 | 10 | 105 | 10.5 | 1 | 34 | · | · | 2 | 10 | · |
| 4 |  Iowa | L 19–20 | 7.8 | 7 | 106 | 15.1 | 0 | 27 | · | · | 1 | -1 | · |
| 5 | @ Minnesota | L 14–20 | 2.1 | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 0 | 12 | · | · | 2 | 12 | · |
| 7 |  Penn State | W 21–18 | 5.7 | 3 | 21 | 7.0 | 0 | 12 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 8 |  Indiana | L 6–13 | 5.6 | 4 | 20 | 5.0 | 0 | 15 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 9 | @ Rutgers | W 28–21 | 6.8 | 7 | 51 | 7.3 | 0 | 13 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 2026 · 8 games | 5.5 | 39 | 360 | 9.2 | 1 | 34 | · | · | 7 | 30 | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 1 | — |
| Yards | 15 | 991st / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | 15 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 15 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 39 | 64th / 2089 |
| Yards | 360 | 175th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 9.2 | 394th / 460 |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 412th / 914 |
| Long | 34 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 1 | 4438th / 5664 |
| Solo | 1 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 2 | — |
| Lost | 2 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
| Punt returns | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Returns | 7 | — |
| Yards | 30 | — |
| Average | 4.3 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 10 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Special teams | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Western Michigan | ✓ WR | 48 | ~40 (26–48) | 5 | 2 | · | 83% |
| Wk 2 · Oklahoma | ✓ WR | 58 | ~50 (33–58) | 7 | · | 1 | 86% |
| Wk 3 · UTEP | ✓ WR | 70 | ~60 (39–70) | 12 | 2 | · | 86% |
| Wk 4 · Iowa | — | 68 | ~62 (41–68) | 11 | 1 | · | 91% |
| Wk 5 · Minnesota | — | 49 | ~43 (28–49) | 7 | 2 | · | 88% |
| Wk 7 · Penn State | ✓ WR | 53 | ~45 (30–53) | 5 | · | 1 | 85% |
| Wk 8 · Indiana | ✓ WR | 74 | ~50 (33–61) | 4 | · | · | 68% |
| Wk 9 · Rutgers | — | 73 | ~62 (41–73) | 9 | · | · | 85% |
| Season | 5 GS | 493 | 412 (346–480) | 60 | 7 | 2 | 84% |
Position Room
12 WRs on the Michigan roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Andrew Marsh | WR | SO | 39 | 360 | 1 | 29% | +0.30 |
| 6 | JJ Buchanan | WR | SO | 38 | 602 | 5 | 29% | +0.66 |
| 12 | Salesi Moa | WR | FR | 3 | 67 | 1 | 5% | +0.29 |
| 9 | Channing Goodwin | WR | JR | 2 | 32 | 0 | 5% | +1.52 |
| 13 | Travis Johnson | WR | FR | 2 | 21 | 0 | 6% | -0.15 |
| 0 | Kendrick Bell | WR | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | Jaime Ffrench Jr. | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | Jaylen Pile | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | Braydon Alford | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 81 | Jamar Browder | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 85 | Logan Forbes | WR | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | Kaleb Schlecht | WR | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Michigan depth chart →