Snap share
85%
3 of 3 started · likely 66–100%
Receptions
15
63rd of 1676 in FBS
Rec. yards
133
201st of 1662 in FBS
Yards / catch
8.9
391st of 499 in FBS
Rec. TD
1
158th of 527 in FBS
EPA / play
+0.31
219th of 301 WR/TEs
Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
EPA per play by situation
24 plays · +7.4 total EPA · 219th of 301 qualifying WR/TEs
All plays+0.31
Passing+0.20
Rushing+2.75
1st down+0.02
2nd down+0.15
3rd down+0.66
Standard downs+0.46
Passing downs+0.10
MarshWR/TE average
Share of team plays
How often the offense runs through this player. Pass = targets or dropbacks, rush = carries
All plays14%
Pass plays32%
Run plays1%
1st down11%
2nd down14%
3rd down17%
Standard downs11%
Passing downs21%
MarshWR/TE average
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|
| Targets | 23 | — |
| Target share | 34.8% | 15th / 489 |
| Catch rate | 65.2% | 277th / 489 |
| Success rate per target | 52.2% | 224th / 489 |
| Yards per target | 5.8 | 387th / 489 |
| Explosive catches | 4.3% | 370th / 489 |
| Deep-target rate | 13.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 5 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|
| Carries | 1 | — |
| Yards | 15 | 759th / 1194 |
| Yards / carry | 15 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 15 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|
| Receptions | 15 | 63rd / 1676 |
| Yards | 133 | 201st / 1662 |
| Yards / catch | 8.9 | 391st / 499 |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 158th / 527 |
| Long | 34 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|
| Fumbles | 1 | — |
| Lost | 1 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
| Punt returns | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|
| Returns | 4 | — |
| Yards | 19 | — |
| Average | 4.8 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 10 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Special teams | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|
| Wk 1 · Western Michigan | ✓ WR | 48 | ~40 (26–48) | 5 | 2 | · | 83% |
| Wk 2 · Oklahoma | ✓ WR | 58 | ~50 (33–58) | 7 | · | 1 | 86% |
| Wk 3 · UTEP | ✓ WR | 70 | ~60 (39–70) | 12 | 2 | · | 86% |
| Season | 3 GS | 176 | 150 (117–176) | 24 | 4 | 1 | 85% |
Position Room
12 WRs on the Michigan roster, ordered by rec
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Michigan depth chart →