Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Defense | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Havoc plays | 1 | 2000th / 2758 |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Run stops | 17 | 291st / 3422 |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| Pass breakups | 1 | — |
| Interceptions | 0 | — |
| Forced fumbles | 0 | — |
| Tackles | 32 | — |
Charting
Where Nash's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
The play-by-play names the defender on breakups, interceptions and tackles, but not the man in coverage on every throw, so true times-targeted isn't in the text. Coverage plays is the closest stand-in; exact targets come from hand charting.
Game Log
Arias Nash's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Defense | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | Hur | PD | INT | TD |
| 1 |  Oklahoma State | W 24–10 | 7.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 2 | @ Sam Houston | W 23–17 | 6.7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | · | · |
| 3 |  East Texas A&M | W 42–0 | 6.4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 4 | @ Arkansas | L 6–34 | 6.0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 5 |  North Texas | L 44–45 | 7.6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 6 | @ Navy | L 26–34 | 7.2 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 7 | @ Rice | W 38–17 | 6.7 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 8 |  Army | L 35–38 | 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 2026 · 8 games | 6.6 | 33 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | · | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 33 | 564th / 5664 |
| Solo | 7 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 1 | 898th / 1772 |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 0 | — |
| Lost | 0 | — |
| Recovered | 2 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Opp. plays | Est. snaps | Plays made | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Oklahoma State | ✓ DL | 85 | ~32 (12–50) | 2 | · | 38% |
| Wk 2 · Sam Houston | ✓ DL | 64 | ~35 (14–55) | 3 | · | 55% |
| Wk 3 · East Texas A&M | ✓ DL | 71 | ~48 (24–60) | 6 | · | 68% |
| Wk 4 · Arkansas | ✓ DL | 79 | ~43 (21–54) | 4 | 1 | 54% |
| Wk 5 · North Texas | ✓ DL | 84 | ~41 (20–52) | 2 | · | 49% |
| Wk 6 · Navy | ✓ DL | 72 | ~49 (24–62) | 9 | · | 68% |
| Wk 7 · Rice | ✓ DL | 62 | ~43 (21–54) | 6 | 1 | 69% |
| Wk 8 · Army | ✓ DL | 64 | ~18 (7–28) | 1 | · | 28% |
| Season | 8 GS | 581 | 309 (197–397) | 33 | 2 | 53% |
Position Room
15 DLs on the Tulsa roster, ordered by tkl
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Tkl | TFL | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Arias Nash | DL | SR | 33 | 0 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 15 | Thomas Davis | DL | SR | 31 | 7.5 | 4 | 1 | 1 |
| 11 | Jaylen George | DL | SR | 28 | 0.5 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 0 | Kyran Duhon | DL | JR | 25 | 6 | 6 | — | 1 |
| 99 | Tai Newhouse | DL | SR | 19 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 58 | Tyler Rich | DL | JR | 15 | 0 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 32 | Hudson Ball | DL | SO | 14 | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 88 | Dailen Howard | DL | SR | 12 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 90 | Jayden Madkins | DL | SR | 8 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 21 | Aquavious Dunbar | DL | SO | 6 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 41 | Will Upshaw | DL | SO | 5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | — | 0 |
| 40 | Tristan Lawyer | DL | FR | 3 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 44 | Kadin Fossung | DL | FR | 2 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 56 | Nathan Price | DL | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 91 | Carson Dempsey | DL | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes —+ plays per team game. Tulsa depth chart →