EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
FBS rank among qualifying players
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 9 · Boston College | 66 | ~26 (12–37) | 1 | 39% |
| Season | 537 | 26 (12–37) | 1 | 5% |
7 TEs on the Duke roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85 | Jeremiah Hasley | TE | SR | 24 | 305 | 1 | 18% | +0.47 |
| 44 | Nate Kurisky | TE | SR | 6 | 41 | 0 | 7% | +0.32 |
| 15 | Jake Taylor | TE | SR | 5 | 76 | 0 | 8% | -0.60 |
| 46 | Tony Boggs | TE | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 80 | Benjamin Moseley | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 81 | Brett Elliott | TE | SO | — | — | — | 4% | -0.33 |
| 84 | Jack Gaskins | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Duke depth chart →