EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 6 | — |
| Target share | 8.3% | — |
| Catch rate | 33.3% | — |
| Success rate per target | 16.7% | — |
| Yards per target | 2.7 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 16.7% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 0 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 2 | — |
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 2 | 991st / 1676 |
| Yards | 16 | 1144th / 1662 |
| Yards / catch | 8 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 11 | — |
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Tulane | — | 76 | ~30 (14–43) | 2 | 39% |
| Wk 2 · Illinois | ✓ TE | 56 | ~26 (12–37) | 3 | 46% |
| Wk 3 · Stanford | — | 71 | ~22 (10–31) | 1 | 31% |
| Season | 1 GS | 203 | 78 (43–104) | 6 | 38% |
7 TEs on the Duke roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85 | Jeremiah Hasley | TE | SR | 10 | 177 | 0 | 25% | +0.42 |
| 15 | Jake Taylor | TE | SR | 2 | 16 | 0 | 9% | -0.78 |
| 44 | Nate Kurisky | TE | SR | 1 | 3 | 0 | — | — |
| 46 | Tony Boggs | TE | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 80 | Benjamin Moseley | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 81 | Brett Elliott | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 84 | Jack Gaskins | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Duke depth chart →