EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 18 | — |
| Target share | 25.0% | 77th / 489 |
| Catch rate | 55.6% | 361st / 489 |
| Success rate per target | 50.0% | 227th / 489 |
| Yards per target | 9.8 | 142nd / 489 |
| Explosive catches | 22.2% | 83rd / 489 |
| Deep-target rate | 16.7% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 4 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 4 | — |
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 10 | 187th / 1676 |
| Yards | 177 | 118th / 1662 |
| Yards / catch | 17.7 | 69th / 499 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 35 | — |
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Tulane | ✓ TE | 76 | ~56 (47–68) | 7 | 74% |
| Wk 2 · Illinois | ✓ TE | 56 | ~34 (16–49) | 5 | 61% |
| Wk 3 · Stanford | ✓ TE | 71 | ~54 (46–65) | 6 | 76% |
| Season | 3 GS | 203 | 144 (122–174) | 18 | 71% |
7 TEs on the Duke roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85 | Jeremiah Hasley | TE | SR | 10 | 177 | 0 | 25% | +0.42 |
| 15 | Jake Taylor | TE | SR | 2 | 16 | 0 | 9% | -0.78 |
| 44 | Nate Kurisky | TE | SR | 1 | 3 | 0 | — | — |
| 46 | Tony Boggs | TE | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 80 | Benjamin Moseley | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 81 | Brett Elliott | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 84 | Jack Gaskins | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Duke depth chart →