Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS QB who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Passing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Dropbacks | 78 | — |
| Success rate | 41.0% | — |
| Explosive pass rate | 8.1% | — |
| Deep-throw rate | 23.0% | — |
| Sack rate | 5.1% | — |
| Interception rate | 2.7% | — |
| 3rd-down conversion | 29.4% | — |
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 164 | — |
| Success rate | 52.4% | 49th / 332 |
| Explosive run rate | 11.0% | 230th / 332 |
| Stuffed at the line | 10.4% | 57th / 332 |
| First downs | 64 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 37 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 16 | — |
Charting
Where Hellums's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he throws73 throws charted
Run direction167 carries
2025 charting · Army
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (6 of Hellums’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he throws47 throws charted
Run direction148 carries
Career
3 seasons since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Cmp/Att | Pass yds | TD–INT | Y/A | Dropback SR | Car | Rush yds | Y/C | Rush TD | Rush SR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Army#76 · 5-3 | 8 | 90% | 43/76 | 462 | 4–2 | 6.1 | 41.0% | 172 | 874 | 5.1 | 17 | 52.4% |
| 2025 | Army#69 · 7-6 | 13 | 73% | 42/77 | 612 | 4–2 | 7.9 | 44.2% | 279 | 1123 | 4.0 | 17 | 46.2% |
| 2024 | Army#31 · 12-2 | 3 | 1% | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 28 | 4.0 | 0 | — |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Cale Hellums's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Cale Hellums's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Passing | Rushing | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Cmp | Att | Pct | Yds | Y/A | TD | INT | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Bryant | W 59–3 | 6.8 | 4 | 9 | 44.4 | 59 | 6.6 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 87 | 12.4 | 2 | 37 |
| 2 |  South Florida | L 24–28 | 6.3 | 9 | 10 | 90.0 | 91 | 9.1 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 55 | 3.1 | 0 | 8 |
| 4 | @ Temple | W 21–17 | — | 3 | 6 | 50.0 | 36 | 6.0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 104 | 4.7 | 3 | 15 |
| 5 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 29–31 | 5.5 | 12 | 24 | 50.0 | 151 | 6.3 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 55 | 2.9 | 1 | 22 |
| 6 |  Tulane | W 20–17 | — | 3 | 6 | 50.0 | 19 | 3.2 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 223 | 5.9 | 2 | 58 |
| 7 |  Florida Atlantic | W 56–24 | — | 1 | 2 | 50.0 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 195 | 7.8 | 5 | 58 |
| 8 | @ Tulsa | W 38–35 | 6.5 | 7 | 12 | 58.3 | 64 | 5.3 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 121 | 4.0 | 3 | 41 |
| 9 | @ Memphis | L 22–49 | — | 4 | 7 | 57.1 | 40 | 5.7 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 34 | 2.6 | 1 | 13 |
| 2026 · 8 games | 6.3 | 43 | 76 | 56.6 | 462 | 6.1 | 4 | 2 | 172 | 874 | 5.1 | 17 | 58 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Passing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Completions | 43 | — |
| Attempts | 76 | — |
| Completion % | 56.6% | — |
| Yards | 462 | 167th / 276 |
| Yards / att. | 6.1 | — |
| Touchdowns | 4 | 137th / 276 |
| Interceptions | 2 | — |
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 172 | — |
| Yards | 874 | 13th / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | 5.1 | 108th / 312 |
| Touchdowns | 17 | 1st / 683 |
| Long | 58 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 1 | — |
| Lost | 0 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps: every offensive play credited to the QB running the offense. Close to a true snap count
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Bryant | ✓ QB | 70 | 41 | 16 | 59% |
| Wk 2 · South Florida | ✓ QB | 62 | 56 | 28 | 90% |
| Wk 4 · Temple | ✓ QB | 64 | 64 | 28 | 100% |
| Wk 5 · Louisiana Tech | ✓ QB | 68 | 68 | 44 | 100% |
| Wk 6 · Tulane | ✓ QB | 64 | 63 | 44 | 98% |
| Wk 7 · Florida Atlantic | ✓ QB | 63 | 59 | 27 | 94% |
| Wk 8 · Tulsa | ✓ QB | 64 | 62 | 42 | 97% |
| Wk 9 · Memphis | — | 61 | 50 | 21 | 82% |
| Season | 7 GS | 516 | 463 | 250 | 90% |
Position Room
5 QBs on the Army roster, ordered by att
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Att | Yds | TD | INT | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Cale Hellums | QB | SR | 76 | 462 | 4 | 2 | +0.30 |
| 6 | Bryson Luter | QB | SO | 4 | 12 | 0 | 1 | +0.34 |
| Ethan Washington | QB | 2 | 13 | 0 | 0 | +0.36 | ||
| 9 | Santiago Fernandez | QB | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | Andrew Heidel | QB | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 12+ plays per team game. Army depth chart →