EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
FBS rank among qualifying players
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Oklahoma State | ✓ TE | 57 | ~33 (15–47) | 1 | 58% |
| Season | 1 GS | 57 | 33 (15–47) | 1 | 58% |
7 TEs on the Tulsa roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Grant McAtee | TE | JR | 1 | 5 | 0 | 3% | -0.56 |
| 87 | Jackson Shockley | TE | FR | 1 | 22 | 1 | 4% | +3.66 |
| 32 | Max Moore | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 82 | Chris Gacayan II | TE | JR | — | — | — | 4% | -0.33 |
| 84 | Jewlyen Roberts | TE | SO | — | — | — | 3% | -0.86 |
| 86 | Luke Tevis | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | Kuba Malecki | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Tulsa depth chart →