Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 15 | — |
| Target share | 11.9% | — |
| Catch rate | 53.3% | — |
| Success rate per target | 33.3% | — |
| Yards per target | 5.3 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 20.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 9 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 2 | — |
Charting
Where Carter's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted19 targets charted
Game Log
Dyzier Carter's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Massachusetts | L 21–37 | 5.4 | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 0 | 8 |
| 2 | @ Boston College | L 21–28 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 3 |  USC | L 35–42 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 4 |  Howard | W 58–7 | 4.3 | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 9 |
| 5 |  Indiana | L 15–47 | 5.9 | 1 | 35 | 35.0 | 0 | 35 |
| 7 | @ Maryland | W 37–30 | 7.6 | 6 | 88 | 14.7 | 0 | 23 |
| 8 | @ Northwestern | L 14–42 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 9 |  Michigan | L 21–28 | — | · | · | · | · | · |
| 2026 · 5 games | 5.8 | 11 | 151 | 13.7 | 0 | 35 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 1 | — |
| Yards | 6 | 1177th / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | 6 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 6 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 11 | 650th / 2089 |
| Yards | 151 | 565th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 13.7 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 35 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Massachusetts | 62 | ~38 (12–52) | 4 | · | 61% |
| Wk 4 · Howard | 72 | ~21 (7–29) | 2 | · | 29% |
| Wk 5 · Indiana | 55 | ~27 (9–37) | 2 | · | 49% |
| Wk 7 · Maryland | 74 | ~51 (34–62) | 6 | · | 69% |
| Wk 8 · Northwestern | 66 | ~20 (6–27) | 2 | 1 | 30% |
| Wk 9 · Michigan | 40 | ~33 (11–40) | 4 | · | 83% |
| Season | 506 | 190 (118–231) | 20 | 1 | 38% |
Position Room
13 WRs on the Rutgers roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | KJ Duff | WR | JR | 45 | 774 | 9 | 36% | +0.76 |
| 4 | Jourdin Houston | WR | SO | 18 | 264 | 1 | 14% | +0.40 |
| 0 | Dyzier Carter | WR | FR | 11 | 151 | 0 | 12% | +0.56 |
| 2 | Ben Black III | WR | JR | 10 | 195 | 2 | 8% | +1.01 |
| 5 | Vernon Allen III | WR | SO | 5 | 72 | 2 | 5% | +1.32 |
| 13 | Elias Coke | WR | FR | 3 | 29 | 1 | 6% | -0.05 |
| 7 | Dylan Braithwaite | WR | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | Sah'nye Degraffenreidt | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | Trent Osborn | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | Salomon Ealey | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 83 | Dino Kaliakmanis | WR | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 87 | Justice Hurt | WR | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| Quentin Redding | WR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Rutgers depth chart →