Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 36 | — |
| Success rate | 30.6% | — |
| Explosive run rate | 16.7% | — |
| Stuffed at the line | 22.2% | — |
| First downs | 8 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 6 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 0 | — |
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 14 | — |
| Target share | 9.9% | — |
| Catch rate | 64.3% | — |
| Success rate per target | 35.7% | — |
| Yards per target | 4.2 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 14.3% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 8 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Charting
Where Mozee's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted16 targets charted
Run direction45 carries
2025 charting · Nebraska
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (3 of Mozee’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted7 targets charted
Run direction14 carries
Career
2 seasons since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Car | Rush yds | Y/C | Rush TD | Rush SR | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Nebraska#20 · 5-3 | 8 | 25% | 46 | 229 | 5.0 | 1 | 30.6% | 11 | 86 | 0 | 9.9% |
| 2025 | Nebraska#61 · 7-6 | 13 | 16% | 26 | 115 | 4.4 | 0 | 30.4% | 14 | 155 | 0 | 7.8% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Isaiah Mozee's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Isaiah Mozee's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Rushing | Receiving | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Ohio | W 49–21 | 5.2 | 6 | 31 | 5.2 | 0 | 24 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 2 |  Bowling Green | W 56–7 | 6.9 | 8 | 55 | 6.9 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 14 | 14.0 | 0 | 14 |
| 3 |  North Dakota | W 34–7 | 5.7 | 10 | 40 | 4.0 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 0 | 13 |
| 4 | @ Michigan State | W 31–13 | 5.2 | 7 | 23 | 3.3 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 0 | 10 |
| 5 |  Maryland | W 48–23 | 6.7 | 8 | 46 | 5.8 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 0 | 13 |
| 6 |  Indiana | L 17–20 | — | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 7 | @ Oregon | L 14–17 | 5.7 | 4 | 28 | 7.0 | 0 | 26 | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 0 | 11 |
| 9 |  Washington | L 10–17 | 5.4 | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 0 | 9 |
| 2026 · 8 games | 5.8 | 46 | 229 | 5.0 | 1 | 26 | 11 | 86 | 7.8 | 0 | 14 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 46 | — |
| Yards | 229 | 301st / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | 5 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 411th / 683 |
| Long | 26 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 11 | 650th / 2089 |
| Yards | 86 | 863rd / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 7.8 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 14 | — |
| Kick returns | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Returns | 1 | — |
| Yards | 17 | — |
| Average | 17 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 17 | — |
| Punt returns | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Returns | 1 | — |
| Yards | 3 | — |
| Average | 3 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 3 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Special teams | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Ohio | ✓ RB | 74 | ~12 (3–23) | 6 | · | 16% |
| Wk 2 · Bowling Green | — | 66 | ~19 (13–25) | 9 | 1 | 29% |
| Wk 3 · North Dakota | — | 71 | ~19 (13–25) | 11 | · | 27% |
| Wk 4 · Michigan State | — | 67 | ~18 (12–23) | 8 | · | 27% |
| Wk 5 · Maryland | ✓ RB | 75 | ~28 (19–36) | 13 | 1 | 37% |
| Wk 6 · Indiana | — | 83 | ~6 (2–12) | 1 | · | 7% |
| Wk 7 · Oregon | — | 67 | ~21 (14–27) | 8 | · | 31% |
| Wk 9 · Washington | — | 72 | ~18 (12–23) | 6 | · | 25% |
| Season | 2 GS | 575 | 141 (112–174) | 62 | 2 | 25% |
Position Room
6 RBs on the Nebraska roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35 | Mekhi Nelson | RB | JR | 77 | 333 | 4.3 | 4 | 11 | +0.16 |
| 25 | Jamal Rule | RB | FR | 73 | 463 | 6.3 | 5 | 4 | +0.42 |
| 22 | Isaiah Mozee | RB | SO | 46 | 229 | 5 | 1 | 11 | +0.11 |
| 30 | Vincent Genatone | RB | SR | 7 | 10 | 1.4 | 2 | 1 | — |
| 21 | Kwinten Ives | RB | SR | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 0 | 2 | +0.95 |
| 23 | Conor Booth | RB | SO | 3 | 21 | 7 | 0 | — | +0.17 |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. Nebraska depth chart →