Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 9 | — |
| Target share | 12.2% | 438th / 534 |
| Catch rate | 55.6% | 423rd / 534 |
| Success rate per target | 33.3% | 480th / 534 |
| Yards per target | 7.3 | 328th / 534 |
| Explosive catches | 11.1% | 262nd / 534 |
| Deep-target rate | 11.1% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 1 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 0 | — |
Charting
Where Allen's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted8 targets charted
Game Log
Jaden Allen's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ New Mexico | L 7–38 | 5.1 | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 0 | 10 |
| 2 |  Colgate | W 13–10 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 3 |  Wyoming | W 24–10 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 4 | @ Miami | L 3–52 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 5 |  Akron | W 41–17 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 6 | @ Ohio | L 14–31 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 7 |  Western Michigan | L 14–21 | 8.3 | 4 | 56 | 14.0 | 1 | 32 |
| 8 |  Miami (OH) | L 27–28 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2026 · 2 games | 6.7 | 5 | 66 | 13.2 | 1 | 32 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 5 | 1122nd / 2089 |
| Yards | 66 | 1004th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 13.2 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 412th / 914 |
| Long | 32 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · New Mexico | — | 48 | ~28 (13–40) | 1 | · | 58% |
| Wk 7 · Western Michigan | — | 73 | ~55 (47–66) | 6 | · | 75% |
| Wk 8 · Miami (OH) | ✓ TE | 60 | ~38 (18–54) | 2 | 2 | 63% |
| Season | 1 GS | 477 | 121 (102–146) | 9 | 2 | 25% |
Position Room
6 TEs on the Central Michigan roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88 | Jaden Allen | TE | SR | 5 | 66 | 1 | 11% | -0.22 |
| 85 | Myles Peters | TE | SO | 4 | 18 | 0 | 6% | -0.23 |
| 87 | Gavin Spillers | TE | SO | 1 | 8 | 0 | 3% | +0.61 |
| 42 | Landon Swanson | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | Lucas Hoffmeyer | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | Zack Wagner | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Central Michigan depth chart →