Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Passing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Dropbacks | 5 | — |
| Success rate | 60.0% | — |
| Explosive pass rate | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-throw rate | 0.0% | — |
| Sack rate | 0.0% | — |
| Interception rate | 0.0% | — |
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 58 | — |
| Target share | 23.0% | 99th / 534 |
| Catch rate | 79.3% | 51st / 534 |
| Success rate per target | 60.3% | 66th / 534 |
| Yards per target | 7.8 | 282nd / 534 |
| Explosive catches | 12.1% | 230th / 534 |
| Deep-target rate | 3.4% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 16 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 9 | — |
Charting
Where Reynolds's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted61 targets charted
2025 charting · Penn State
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (4 of Reynolds’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted8 targets charted
Career
3 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Virginia Tech#49 · 6-2 | 8 | 71% | 50 | 493 | 6 | 23.0% |
| 2025 |  Penn State#18 · 7-6 | 10 | 51% | 26 | 257 | 0 | 12.2% |
| 2024 | Penn State#4 · 13-3 | 6 | 15% | 9 | 111 | 1 | 4.6% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Luke Reynolds's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Luke Reynolds's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  VMI | W 73–3 | 8.2 | 5 | 50 | 10.0 | 1 | 21 |
| 2 |  Old Dominion | W 44–21 | 9.9 | 8 | 108 | 13.5 | 2 | 21 |
| 3 | @ Maryland | W 35–26 | 9.8 | 12 | 107 | 8.9 | 1 | 25 |
| 4 | @ Boston College | W 21–14 | 6.0 | 5 | 15 | 3.0 | 0 | 7 |
| 5 |  Pittsburgh | L 33–35 | 9.0 | 7 | 93 | 13.3 | 0 | 23 |
| 6 | @ California | L 20–25 | 7.8 | 4 | 58 | 14.5 | 0 | 22 |
| 7 |  Georgia Tech | W 34–24 | 5.8 | 2 | 18 | 9.0 | 0 | 13 |
| 8 | @ Clemson | W 20–16 | 8.8 | 7 | 44 | 6.3 | 2 | 10 |
| 2026 · 8 games | 8.2 | 50 | 493 | 9.9 | 6 | 25 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Passing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Completions | 1 | — |
| Attempts | 1 | — |
| Completion % | 100.0% | — |
| Yards | 8 | — |
| Yards / att. | 8 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Interceptions | 0 | — |
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 2 | — |
| Yards | 1 | 1340th / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | 0.5 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 3 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 50 | 19th / 2089 |
| Yards | 493 | 75th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 9.9 | 365th / 460 |
| Touchdowns | 6 | 22nd / 914 |
| Long | 25 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 1 | 4438th / 5664 |
| Solo | 1 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Plays made | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · VMI | ✓ TE | 72 | ~37 (17–53) | 4 | · | 51% |
| Wk 2 · Old Dominion | ✓ TE | 86 | ~46 (39–56) | 11 | · | 53% |
| Wk 3 · Maryland | ✓ TE | 75 | ~58 (49–70) | 12 | · | 77% |
| Wk 4 · Boston College | ✓ TE | 77 | ~69 (58–77) | 13 | · | 90% |
| Wk 5 · Pittsburgh | ✓ TE | 73 | ~54 (46–65) | 7 | 1 | 74% |
| Wk 6 · California | — | 64 | ~57 (48–64) | 9 | · | 89% |
| Wk 7 · Georgia Tech | — | 63 | ~36 (17–51) | 3 | · | 57% |
| Wk 8 · Clemson | — | 70 | ~53 (45–64) | 9 | · | 76% |
| Season | 5 GS | 580 | 410 (351–490) | 68 | 1 | 71% |
Position Room
8 TEs on the Virginia Tech roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85 | Luke Reynolds | TE | JR | 50 | 493 | 6 | 21% | +0.56 |
| 13 | Ja'Ricous Hairston | TE | SR | 6 | 81 | 2 | 4% | +0.89 |
| 82 | Benji Gosnell | TE | SR | 6 | 33 | 0 | 5% | -0.19 |
| 87 | Harrison Saint Germain | TE | SR | 3 | 15 | 0 | — | — |
| 88 | Pierce Petersohn | TE | FR | 2 | 6 | 0 | 7% | -0.30 |
| 36 | Brody Jones | TE | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | Matt Henderson | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 99 | Cole Reemsnyder | TE | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Virginia Tech depth chart →