Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 58 | — |
| Target share | 33.0% | 7th / 534 |
| Catch rate | 63.8% | 284th / 534 |
| Success rate per target | 56.9% | 110th / 534 |
| Yards per target | 8.6 | 223rd / 534 |
| Explosive catches | 10.3% | 292nd / 534 |
| Deep-target rate | 13.8% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 14 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 8 | — |
Charting
Where Neer's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted55 targets charted
Game Log
Riley Neer's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ Nebraska | L 21–49 | 8.4 | 6 | 104 | 17.3 | 1 | 68 |
| 2 |  Jacksonville State | W 29–27 | 6.8 | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 1 | 15 |
| 3 | @ South Alabama | L 36–41 | 7.9 | 6 | 61 | 10.2 | 2 | 17 |
| 4 |  Stonehill | W 35–7 | 8.0 | 5 | 113 | 22.6 | 0 | 34 |
| 5 | @ Kent State | W 13–10 | 5.4 | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 0 | 13 |
| 6 |  Central Michigan | W 31–14 | 7.3 | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 1 | 32 |
| 7 | @ Sacramento State | W 48–7 | 6.5 | 5 | 44 | 8.8 | 0 | 17 |
| 8 |  Eastern Michigan | W 24–20 | 6.8 | 5 | 56 | 11.2 | 0 | 19 |
| 2026 · 8 games | 7.1 | 37 | 496 | 13.4 | 5 | 68 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 37 | 79th / 2089 |
| Yards | 496 | 72nd / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 13.4 | 175th / 460 |
| Touchdowns | 5 | 38th / 914 |
| Long | 68 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Nebraska | ✓ WR | 65 | ~56 (37–65) | 12 | 86% |
| Wk 2 · Jacksonville State | ✓ WR | 66 | ~50 (33–61) | 5 | 76% |
| Wk 3 · South Alabama | ✓ WR | 59 | ~50 (33–59) | 8 | 85% |
| Wk 4 · Stonehill | ✓ WR | 71 | ~53 (35–65) | 6 | 75% |
| Wk 5 · Kent State | ✓ WR | 55 | ~30 (10–41) | 2 | 55% |
| Wk 6 · Central Michigan | — | 67 | ~58 (38–67) | 9 | 87% |
| Wk 7 · Sacramento State | ✓ WR | 64 | ~43 (28–52) | 6 | 67% |
| Wk 8 · Eastern Michigan | — | 55 | ~50 (33–55) | 11 | 91% |
| Season | 6 GS | 502 | 390 (327–454) | 59 | 78% |
Position Room
15 WRs on the Ohio roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | Riley Neer | WR | SO | 37 | 496 | 5 | 29% | +0.64 |
| 3 | Dom Dorwart | WR | SO | 18 | 339 | 4 | 15% | +0.79 |
| 2 | Preston Bowman | WR | FR | 16 | 198 | 2 | 16% | +0.21 |
| 11 | Zach Hackleman | WR | FR | 2 | 21 | 0 | 5% | +0.95 |
| 12 | Eian Pugh | WR | SR | 2 | 8 | 0 | 11% | -0.45 |
| 0 | Delaney Crawford | WR | SR | 1 | 6 | 0 | 9% | -0.16 |
| 37 | Blake Guffey | WR | SR | 1 | 12 | 0 | 4% | +0.46 |
| 10 | Ian Ver Steeg | WR | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | Rashad Perry | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | Blake Parker | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | Miles Cremascoli | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | Khamani Debrow | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | Simon Smith | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 80 | Kaden Page | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 88 | Marcus Cain | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Ohio depth chart →