Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 35 | — |
| Target share | 15.0% | 326th / 534 |
| Catch rate | 60.0% | 358th / 534 |
| Success rate per target | 48.6% | 260th / 534 |
| Yards per target | 9.2 | 172nd / 534 |
| Explosive catches | 20.0% | 57th / 534 |
| Deep-target rate | 11.4% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 12 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 5 | — |
Charting
Where Wright's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted33 targets charted
Game Log
Akeem Wright's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ Oregon | L 27–34 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2 |  Memphis | W 38–20 | 7.9 | 4 | 84 | 21.0 | 1 | 40 |
| 3 |  South Dakota | W 38–24 | 5.5 | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 0 | 21 |
| 4 | @ Western Michigan | W 32–7 | 5.4 | 1 | 23 | 23.0 | 0 | 23 |
| 5 |  Utah State | W 37–18 | 6.0 | 2 | 36 | 18.0 | 0 | 33 |
| 6 | @ Fresno State | W 38–31 | 5.1 | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 0 | 8 |
| 8 | @ Washington State | W 31–10 | 5.6 | 2 | 24 | 12.0 | 0 | 12 |
| 9 |  Texas State | W 46–45 | 8.7 | 8 | 116 | 14.5 | 1 | 24 |
| 2026 · 7 games | 6.3 | 21 | 321 | 15.3 | 2 | 40 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 21 | 299th / 2089 |
| Yards | 321 | 226th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 15.3 | 92nd / 460 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 223rd / 914 |
| Long | 40 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Oregon | ✓ WR | 64 | ~34 (11–47) | 2 | 53% |
| Wk 2 · Memphis | ✓ WR | 75 | ~46 (30–56) | 5 | 61% |
| Wk 3 · South Dakota | ✓ WR | 79 | ~46 (30–56) | 4 | 58% |
| Wk 4 · Western Michigan | — | 65 | ~22 (7–30) | 2 | 34% |
| Wk 5 · Utah State | ✓ WR | 62 | ~33 (11–45) | 2 | 53% |
| Wk 6 · Fresno State | — | 79 | ~45 (30–55) | 5 | 57% |
| Wk 8 · Washington State | — | 61 | ~44 (29–54) | 5 | 72% |
| Wk 9 · Texas State | ✓ WR | 86 | ~67 (44–82) | 10 | 78% |
| Season | 5 GS | 571 | 337 (283–393) | 35 | 59% |
Position Room
17 WRs on the Boise State roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | Rasean Jones | WR | FR | 37 | 545 | 4 | 25% | +0.79 |
| Akeem Wright | WR | 21 | 321 | 2 | 14% | +0.57 | ||
| 3 | Cam Bates | WR | JR | 14 | 101 | 3 | 11% | +0.68 |
| 82 | Ben Ford | WR | SR | 12 | 137 | 2 | 9% | +0.66 |
| Qumonte Williams Jr. | WR | 4 | 36 | 0 | 5% | +0.12 | ||
| 25 | Quinton Brown | WR | SO | 2 | 13 | 0 | 9% | -0.04 |
| 85 | Terrious Favors | WR | FR | 2 | 27 | 1 | 3% | +0.91 |
| 13 | Darren Morris | WR | SR | 1 | 5 | 0 | 3% | -1.40 |
| 17 | AJ Jones | WR | FR | 1 | 7 | 0 | 6% | +0.94 |
| 24 | AJ Maes | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | Lincoln Dunn | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | Jeremyah Lane | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 80 | Romeo Carter | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 81 | Kamryn Jones | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 84 | Gavin Packer | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | AJ Logan | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| Carson Monagan | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Boise State depth chart →