Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 15 | — |
| Success rate | 46.7% | — |
| Explosive run rate | 13.3% | — |
| Stuffed at the line | 13.3% | — |
| First downs | 6 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 5 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 4 | — |
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 5 | — |
| Target share | 3.9% | — |
| Catch rate | 80.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 60.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 13.2 | — |
| Explosive catches | 20.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 0 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Charting
Where Harris's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted5 targets charted
Run direction28 carries
2025 charting · Purdue
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (5 of Harris’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted14 targets charted
Run direction48 carries
Career
3 seasons since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Car | Rush yds | Y/C | Rush TD | Rush SR | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Purdue#71 · 3-5 | 7 | 18% | 28 | 162 | 5.8 | 2 | 46.7% | 4 | 66 | 0 | 3.9% |
| 2025 | Purdue#100 · 2-10 | 12 | 31% | 69 | 305 | 4.4 | 2 | 37.7% | 17 | 137 | 0 | 5.2% |
| 2024 | Purdue#122 · 1-11 | 1 | 1% | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Antonio Harris's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Antonio Harris's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Rushing | Receiving | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Indiana State | W 44–19 | 5.2 | 6 | 32 | 5.3 | 0 | 13 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 2 |  Wake Forest | L 36–38 | — | no stats recorded | |||||||||
| 3 | @ UCLA | L 38–52 | — | · | · | · | · | · | 1 | 47 | 47.0 | 0 | 47 |
| 4 |  Notre Dame | L 10–49 | — | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 0 | 8 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 5 | @ Illinois | W 24–17 | 5.8 | 6 | 20 | 3.3 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 |
| 6 |  Minnesota | W 41–13 | 4.0 | 8 | 23 | 2.9 | 0 | 10 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 7 |  Washington | L 26–38 | 7.5 | 4 | 65 | 16.3 | 1 | 59 | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | 7 |
| 9 | @ Penn State | L 17–31 | — | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 8 |
| 2026 · 7 games | 5.6 | 28 | 162 | 5.8 | 2 | 59 | 4 | 66 | 16.5 | 0 | 47 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 28 | — |
| Yards | 162 | 390th / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | 5.8 | — |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 266th / 683 |
| Long | 59 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 4 | 1233rd / 2089 |
| Yards | 66 | 1004th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 16.5 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 47 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 1 | 4438th / 5664 |
| Solo | 1 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
| Kick returns | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Returns | 1 | — |
| Yards | 16 | — |
| Average | 16 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 16 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Plays made | Special teams | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Indiana State | 74 | ~14 (4–27) | 6 | · | · | 19% |
| Wk 3 · UCLA | 59 | ~11 (3–21) | 1 | · | · | 19% |
| Wk 4 · Notre Dame | 68 | ~9 (2–17) | 3 | · | 1 | 13% |
| Wk 5 · Illinois | 60 | ~18 (12–23) | 8 | · | · | 30% |
| Wk 6 · Minnesota | 71 | ~18 (12–23) | 8 | · | · | 25% |
| Wk 7 · Washington | 68 | ~19 (13–25) | 5 | 1 | · | 28% |
| Wk 9 · Penn State | 44 | ~8 (2–16) | 2 | · | · | 18% |
| Season | 526 | 97 (71–211) | 33 | 1 | 1 | 18% |
Position Room
5 RBs on the Purdue roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Fame Ijeboi | RB | SO | 141 | 588 | 4.2 | 9 | 17 | +0.09 |
| 22 | Antonio Harris | RB | JR | 28 | 162 | 5.8 | 2 | 4 | +0.12 |
| 4 | Jerrick Gibson | RB | SO | 18 | 58 | 3.2 | 0 | 2 | -0.14 |
| Travis Terrell Jr. | RB | 17 | 45 | 2.6 | 0 | 3 | -0.06 | ||
| 31 | Carter Holsworth | RB | SO | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. Purdue depth chart →