Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 34 | — |
| Success rate | 29.4% | — |
| Explosive run rate | 8.8% | — |
| Stuffed at the line | 17.6% | — |
| First downs | 8 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 1 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 0 | — |
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 7 | — |
| Target share | 7.3% | — |
| Catch rate | 71.4% | — |
| Success rate per target | 42.9% | — |
| Yards per target | 2.9 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 1 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 0 | — |
Charting
Where Roland's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted7 targets charted
Run direction42 carries
Game Log
Bryson Roland's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Rushing | Receiving | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ Mississippi State | L 13–62 | 4.6 | 12 | 42 | 3.5 | 0 | 15 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 2 | @ UAB | L 20–26 | 6.2 | 19 | 86 | 4.5 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 8 |
| 3 |  SE Louisiana | L 35–38 | 5.2 | 4 | 4 | 1.0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 0 | 11 |
| 4 |  Florida Atlantic | L 17–45 | — | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 5 | @ South Alabama | L 35–52 | 4.1 | 4 | 12 | 3.0 | 0 | 6 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 7 |  Louisiana Tech | L 0–24 | — | 3 | 6 | 2.0 | 0 | 4 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 8 | @ Troy | W 21–14 | — | · | · | · | · | · | 1 | -4 | -4.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 |  Southern Miss | L 21–35 | — | no stats recorded | |||||||||
| 2026 · 7 games | 5.0 | 43 | 150 | 3.5 | 0 | 18 | 5 | 20 | 4.0 | 0 | 11 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 43 | — |
| Yards | 150 | 403rd / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | 3.5 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 18 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 5 | 1122nd / 2089 |
| Yards | 20 | 1538th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 4 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 11 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Mississippi State | — | 68 | ~32 (22–41) | 12 | 47% |
| Wk 2 · UAB | ✓ RB | 63 | ~43 (36–48) | 20 | 68% |
| Wk 3 · SE Louisiana | — | 80 | ~27 (18–35) | 8 | 34% |
| Wk 4 · Florida Atlantic | — | 55 | ~9 (2–17) | 1 | 16% |
| Wk 5 · South Alabama | — | 69 | ~19 (13–25) | 5 | 28% |
| Wk 7 · Louisiana Tech | — | 55 | ~10 (2–19) | 2 | 18% |
| Wk 8 · Troy | — | 61 | ~10 (2–19) | 2 | 16% |
| Season | 1 GS | 528 | 150 (119–185) | 50 | 28% |
Position Room
9 RBs on the UL Monroe roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | Bryson Roland | RB | SO | 43 | 150 | 3.5 | 0 | 5 | -0.30 |
| 6 | Zach Palmer-Smith | RB | SR | 34 | 156 | 4.6 | 1 | 4 | +0.10 |
| 3 | Derrick Jameson | RB | SR | 29 | 145 | 5 | 2 | 8 | +0.06 |
| 23 | CJ Phillip | RB | JR | 25 | 67 | 2.7 | 1 | 5 | -0.04 |
| 20 | Don Chaney | RB | SR | 19 | 75 | 3.9 | 0 | — | -0.08 |
| 26 | Trevon Kinchen | RB | SR | 9 | 25 | 2.8 | 0 | — | +0.12 |
| 21 | Julian Walker | RB | JR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | Makin Lenard | RB | SO | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | Christian Ponti | RB | FR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. UL Monroe depth chart →