Snap share
48%
2 of 2 started · likely 16–71%
Tackles
8
1101st of 4521 in FBS
Solo
4
Tackles for loss
0
Sacks
0
Interceptions
0
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Defense | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Havoc plays | 0 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Run stops | 5 | 435th / 2586 |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| Pass breakups | 0 | — |
| Interceptions | 0 | — |
| Forced fumbles | 0 | — |
| Tackles | 8 | — |
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 8 | 1101st / 4521 |
| Solo | 4 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Opp. plays | Est. snaps | Plays made | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Nebraska | ✓ LB | 74 | ~66 (34–74) | 7 | 89% |
| Wk 2 · Jacksonville State | ✓ LB | 72 | ~4 (0–23) | 1 | 6% |
| Season | 2 GS | 146 | 70 (24–104) | 8 | 48% |
Position Room
9 LBs on the Ohio roster, ordered by tkl
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Tkl | TFL | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | Michael Molnar | LB | SR | 33 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 27 | Jack Fries | LB | SR | 22 | 0.5 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 30 | Charlie Christopher | LB | SO | 8 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 12 | Jermaine Minnis | LB | FR | 2 | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 56 | Cody Raymond | LB | SO | 2 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 15 | Will Marzolf | LB | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | Alex Brown | LB | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | Mac Capen | LB | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 52 | Nolan Ogburn | LB | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes —+ plays per team game. Ohio depth chart →