Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 10 | — |
| Target share | 5.2% | — |
| Catch rate | 60.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 50.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 8.1 | — |
| Explosive catches | 20.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 10.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 2 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 2 | — |
Charting
Where Williams's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted11 targets charted
Game Log
Charlie Williams's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ Georgia Tech | W 14–13 | 7.3 | 2 | 28 | 14.0 | 1 | 20 |
| 2 |  Weber State | W 52–21 | 6.0 | 1 | 23 | 23.0 | 0 | 23 |
| 3 | @ Northwestern | L 7–41 | 3.2 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 |
| 4 | @ Baylor | L 13–23 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 5 |  Texas Tech | L 7–29 | 5.6 | 1 | 16 | 16.0 | 0 | 16 |
| 7 |  Utah | L 24–27 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 8 | @ Oklahoma State | L 24–57 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 9 |  Kansas State | W 27–24 | 6.5 | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 1 | 11 |
| 2026 · 5 games | 5.7 | 6 | 81 | 13.5 | 2 | 23 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 6 | 1004th / 2089 |
| Yards | 81 | 897th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 13.5 | — |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 223rd / 914 |
| Long | 23 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Georgia Tech | — | 75 | ~43 (36–52) | 2 | · | 57% |
| Wk 2 · Weber State | — | 72 | ~30 (14–43) | 2 | · | 42% |
| Wk 3 · Northwestern | ✓ TE | 62 | ~39 (18–56) | 2 | · | 63% |
| Wk 5 · Texas Tech | — | 80 | ~28 (13–40) | 1 | · | 35% |
| Wk 7 · Utah | ✓ TE | 54 | ~31 (14–44) | 1 | 1 | 57% |
| Wk 8 · Oklahoma State | — | 62 | ~43 (36–52) | 2 | 2 | 69% |
| Wk 9 · Kansas State | ✓ TE | 64 | ~26 (12–37) | 1 | · | 41% |
| Season | 3 GS | 550 | 240 (184–335) | 11 | 3 | 44% |
Position Room
6 TEs on the Colorado roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87 | Charlie Williams | TE | SR | 6 | 81 | 2 | 5% | +0.66 |
| 85 | Zach Atkins | TE | SR | 3 | 28 | 0 | 6% | +0.18 |
| 89 | Fisher Clements | TE | SR | 2 | 16 | 0 | 3% | +0.19 |
| 83 | Zayne DeSouza | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 86 | Brady Kopetz | TE | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 88 | Corbin Laisure | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Colorado depth chart →