Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 16 | — |
| Target share | 8.2% | — |
| Catch rate | 81.2% | — |
| Success rate per target | 50.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 8.0 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 4 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Charting
Where Corbo's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted17 targets charted
Game Log
Chris Corbo's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Colorado | L 13–14 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2 |  Tennessee | L 24–45 | 6.0 | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 0 | 18 |
| 3 |  Mercer | W 44–11 | 4.3 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 |
| 4 | @ Stanford | L 27–34 | 5.6 | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 0 | 11 |
| 6 |  Duke | W 28–25 | 5.8 | 2 | 18 | 9.0 | 0 | 15 |
| 7 | @ Virginia Tech | L 24–34 | 6.9 | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 0 | 18 |
| 8 |  Boston College | L 27–49 | 6.5 | 2 | 26 | 13.0 | 0 | 17 |
| 9 | @ Pittsburgh | L 11–34 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2026 · 6 games | 5.9 | 13 | 121 | 9.3 | 0 | 18 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 13 | 558th / 2089 |
| Yards | 121 | 670th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 9.3 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 18 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 1 | 4438th / 5664 |
| Solo | 1 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Plays made | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 2 · Tennessee | — | 71 | ~22 (10–31) | 2 | · | 31% |
| Wk 3 · Mercer | — | 62 | ~26 (12–37) | 2 | · | 42% |
| Wk 4 · Stanford | ✓ TE | 70 | ~32 (15–46) | 3 | · | 46% |
| Wk 6 · Duke | — | 57 | ~27 (13–39) | 3 | · | 47% |
| Wk 7 · Virginia Tech | — | 59 | ~34 (16–49) | 5 | · | 58% |
| Wk 8 · Boston College | — | 60 | ~25 (12–36) | 2 | 1 | 42% |
| Season | 1 GS | 509 | 166 (127–232) | 17 | 1 | 33% |
Position Room
8 TEs on the Georgia Tech roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86 | Kevin Roche Jr. | TE | SO | 35 | 298 | 1 | 19% | +0.18 |
| 17 | Chris Corbo | TE | SR | 13 | 121 | 0 | 8% | +0.35 |
| 8 | Gavin Harris | TE | SR | 7 | 77 | 0 | 7% | -0.09 |
| 39 | Jack Richerson | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | Spencer Mermans | TE | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 80 | Connor Roush | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 83 | Blake Ragsdale | TE | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 88 | Nate Agyemang | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Georgia Tech depth chart →