EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 13 | — |
| Success rate | 53.8% | — |
| Explosive run rate | 15.4% | — |
| Stuffed at the line | 7.7% | — |
| First downs | 6 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 3 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 0 | — |
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 14 | — |
| Yards | 64 | 404th / 1194 |
| Yards / carry | 4.6 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 200th / 476 |
| Long | 17 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 1 | 1257th / 1676 |
| Yards | 7 | 1420th / 1662 |
| Yards / catch | 7 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 7 | — |
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Massachusetts | 62 | ~15 (10–19) | 4 | 24% |
| Wk 2 · Boston College | 68 | ~20 (14–26) | 8 | 29% |
| Wk 3 · USC | 69 | ~17 (12–22) | 6 | 25% |
| Season | 199 | 52 (37–64) | 18 | 26% |
7 RBs on the Rutgers roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antwan Raymond | RB | 62 | 298 | 4.8 | 1 | 7 | +0.21 | ||
| Clay Thevenin | RB | 14 | 64 | 4.6 | 1 | 1 | -0.05 | ||
| 20 | Ja'shon Benjamin | RB | SR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | Michael Dukes III | RB | FR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | Edd Guerrier | RB | JR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | Terrell Mitchell | RB | SO | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | Aiden Gibson | RB | FR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. Rutgers depth chart →