Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 10 | — |
| Target share | 6.7% | — |
| Catch rate | 40.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 30.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 4.5 | — |
| Explosive catches | 10.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 20.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 1 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Charting
Where Edgehille's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted9 targets charted
Game Log
Danny Edgehille's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ Cincinnati | L 15–34 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2 |  Rutgers | W 28–21 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 3 |  Maine | W 22–16 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 4 |  Virginia Tech | L 14–21 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 5 | @ SMU | L 16–25 | 7.2 | 2 | 26 | 13.0 | 1 | 20 |
| 7 |  Pittsburgh | W 27–21 | 5.3 | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 0 | 13 |
| 8 | @ Georgia Tech | W 49–27 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 9 | @ Duke | L 2–47 | 4.3 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 |
| 2026 · 3 games | 5.6 | 4 | 45 | 11.3 | 1 | 20 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 4 | 1233rd / 2089 |
| Yards | 45 | 1198th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 11.3 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 412th / 914 |
| Long | 20 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Cincinnati | 72 | ~28 (13–40) | 2 | · | 39% |
| Wk 2 · Rutgers | 61 | ~24 (11–34) | 1 | · | 39% |
| Wk 5 · SMU | 65 | ~35 (16–50) | 3 | · | 54% |
| Wk 7 · Pittsburgh | 67 | ~26 (12–37) | 1 | · | 39% |
| Wk 8 · Georgia Tech | 64 | ~45 (38–54) | 2 | 1 | 70% |
| Wk 9 · Duke | 59 | ~12 (6–18) | 1 | · | 20% |
| Season | 510 | 170 (130–237) | 10 | 1 | 33% |
Position Room
8 TEs on the Boston College roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84 | Brady Clough | TE | SO | 7 | 61 | 0 | 12% | -0.24 |
| 48 | Zeke Moore | TE | SR | 6 | 63 | 0 | 5% | +0.11 |
| 86 | Danny Edgehille | TE | SO | 4 | 45 | 1 | 5% | +0.23 |
| 85 | Kaelan Chudzinski | TE | SO | 1 | 16 | 0 | 16% | -1.39 |
| 46 | Dominic DeSarno | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 87 | Cameron Kossmann | TE | FR | — | — | — | 3% | -2.36 |
| 88 | Bryce Lewis | TE | FR | — | — | — | 5% | -1.13 |
| 89 | DJ Johnson | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Boston College depth chart →