EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 6 | — |
| Target share | 6.0% | — |
| Catch rate | 83.3% | — |
| Success rate per target | 66.7% | — |
| Yards per target | 15.0 | — |
| Explosive catches | 33.3% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 50.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 0 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 0 | — |
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 5 | 500th / 1676 |
| Yards | 90 | 356th / 1662 |
| Yards / catch | 18 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 158th / 527 |
| Long | 30 | — |
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Indiana State | — | 74 | ~54 (46–65) | 3 | · | 73% |
| Wk 2 · Wake Forest | — | 82 | ~33 (15–47) | 2 | · | 40% |
| Wk 3 · UCLA | ✓ TE | 59 | ~34 (16–49) | 1 | 1 | 58% |
| Season | 1 GS | 215 | 121 (102–146) | 6 | 1 | 56% |
8 TEs on the Purdue roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81 | George Burhenn | TE | JR | 5 | 90 | 1 | 5% | +1.13 |
| Ar'mari Towns | TE | 3 | 15 | 0 | 5% | -0.02 | ||
| 85 | Luca Puccinelli | TE | SO | 1 | 18 | 0 | 2% | +0.45 |
| 16 | Kylan Fox | TE | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | Jon Grimmett | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | Jackson Berryman | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 87 | Cooper McCutchan | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 94 | Luke Shorter | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Purdue depth chart →