Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 6 | — |
| Target share | 3.6% | — |
| Catch rate | 83.3% | — |
| Success rate per target | 33.3% | — |
| Yards per target | 8.7 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 1 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Charting
Where Butler-Tanner's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted6 targets charted
Game Log
Isaiah Butler-Tanner's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  UT Rio Grande Valley | W 45–16 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2 | @ Texas State | W 31–26 | 5.4 | 1 | 14 | 14.0 | 0 | 14 |
| 3 | @ Texas | L 6–30 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 4 |  Colorado State | W 59–45 | 5.2 | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 0 | 12 |
| 5 | @ Rice | W 16–14 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 6 |  South Florida | W 31–24 | 2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 |
| 7 |  Navy | W 38–34 | 5.3 | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 0 | 13 |
| 8 | @ Tulane | W 42–19 | 5.2 | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 0 | 12 |
| 2026 · 5 games | 4.7 | 5 | 52 | 10.4 | 0 | 14 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 5 | 1122nd / 2089 |
| Yards | 52 | 1124th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 10.4 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 14 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 2 · Texas State | — | 74 | ~16 (7–23) | 1 | · | 22% |
| Wk 3 · Texas | — | 46 | · | · | 1 | — |
| Wk 4 · Colorado State | — | 72 | ~21 (10–30) | 1 | · | 29% |
| Wk 5 · Rice | ✓ TE | 71 | · | · | 1 | — |
| Wk 6 · South Florida | — | 75 | ~29 (13–41) | 1 | · | 39% |
| Wk 7 · Navy | ✓ TE | 70 | ~42 (36–51) | 2 | · | 60% |
| Wk 8 · Tulane | — | 69 | ~24 (11–34) | 1 | · | 35% |
| Season | 2 GS | 535 | 132 (91–177) | 6 | 2 | 25% |
Position Room
6 TEs on the UTSA roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon Young Jr. | TE | 11 | 108 | 3 | 7% | +0.81 | ||
| 81 | Miles Campbell | TE | SR | 5 | 73 | 0 | 5% | +0.23 |
| 86 | Isaiah Butler-Tanner | TE | FR | 5 | 52 | 0 | 4% | +0.25 |
| 83 | Cole Ramseur | TE | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 85 | Ty Rupe | TE | FR | — | — | — | 4% | -0.32 |
| 88 | Trysten Laughlin | TE | FR | — | — | — | 2% | -0.99 |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. UTSA depth chart →