Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 11 | — |
| Target share | 11.0% | 487th / 534 |
| Catch rate | 63.6% | 286th / 534 |
| Success rate per target | 54.5% | 150th / 534 |
| Yards per target | 8.2 | 256th / 534 |
| Explosive catches | 9.1% | 336th / 534 |
| Deep-target rate | 9.1% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 2 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Charting
Where Lott's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted11 targets charted
The play-by-play names the defender on breakups, interceptions and tackles, but not the man in coverage on every throw, so true times-targeted isn't in the text. Coverage plays is the closest stand-in; exact targets come from hand charting.
Game Log
Jalen Lott's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Boise State | W 34–27 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2 | @ Oklahoma State | L 31–39 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 3 |  Portland State | W 84–0 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 4 | @ USC | W 41–27 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 6 |  UCLA | L 15–17 | 3.9 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 |
| 7 |  Nebraska | W 17–14 | 5.6 | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 0 | 12 |
| 8 | @ Illinois | L 10–21 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 9 |  Northwestern | W 34–26 | 6.8 | 3 | 61 | 20.3 | 0 | 35 |
| 2026 · 3 games | 5.4 | 7 | 90 | 12.9 | 0 | 35 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 7 | 917th / 2089 |
| Yards | 90 | 833rd / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 12.9 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 35 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 6 · UCLA | — | 61 | ~10 (3–16) | 1 | 16% |
| Wk 7 · Nebraska | ✓ WR | 76 | ~54 (35–66) | 5 | 71% |
| Wk 9 · Northwestern | — | 59 | ~47 (31–57) | 5 | 80% |
| Season | 1 GS | 553 | 111 (52–143) | 11 | 20% |
Position Room
14 WRs on the Oregon roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dakorien Moore | WR | SO | 41 | 545 | 6 | 22% | +0.12 |
| 7 | Evan Stewart | WR | SR | 31 | 423 | 4 | 18% | +0.34 |
| 15 | Messiah Hampton | WR | FR | 18 | 161 | 2 | 15% | +0.40 |
| 83 | Hudson Lewis | WR | FR | 8 | 93 | 0 | 12% | +0.23 |
| 3 | Jeremiah McClellan | WR | JR | 7 | 170 | 1 | 17% | +1.01 |
| 10 | Jalen Lott | WR | FR | 7 | 90 | 0 | 11% | +0.53 |
| 13 | Gatlin Bair | WR | FR | 3 | 25 | 0 | 5% | -0.14 |
| 2 | Iverson Hooks | WR | SR | 2 | 14 | 0 | 5% | -0.17 |
| 89 | Brady Bidwell | WR | JR | 2 | 12 | 1 | 7% | +0.61 |
| 82 | Nathan McCoy II | WR | SO | 1 | 11 | 0 | 4% | +0.16 |
| 30 | Aaron Bidwell | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 80 | Dillon Gresham | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 84 | Jovon McRae II | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 88 | Jack Ressler | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Oregon depth chart →