Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Defense | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Havoc plays | 5 | 478th / 2758 |
| Tackles for loss | 4 | 322nd / 2112 |
| Run stops | 14 | 444th / 3422 |
| Sacks | 1 | — |
| Pass breakups | 1 | — |
| Interceptions | 0 | — |
| Forced fumbles | 0 | — |
| Tackles | 21 | — |
Charting
Where Bailey's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
The play-by-play names the defender on breakups, interceptions and tackles, but not the man in coverage on every throw, so true times-targeted isn't in the text. Coverage plays is the closest stand-in; exact targets come from hand charting.
Game Log
Jeremiah Bailey's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Defense | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | Hur | PD | INT | TD |
| 1 |  UT Rio Grande Valley | W 45–16 | 6.7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | · | · |
| 2 | @ Texas State | W 31–26 | 6.0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 3 | @ Texas | L 6–30 | 5.1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 4 |  Colorado State | W 59–45 | 5.8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 5 | @ Rice | W 16–14 | 9.1 | 4 | 3 | 2.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | · | · |
| 6 |  South Florida | W 31–24 | 6.7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | · | · |
| 7 |  Navy | W 38–34 | 7.0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 8 | @ Tulane | W 42–19 | 5.3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | · | · |
| 2026 · 8 games | 6.5 | 21 | 8 | 3.5 | 1 | 7 | 1 | · | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 21 | 1232nd / 5664 |
| Solo | 8 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 3.5 | 470th / 2634 |
| Sacks | 1 | 620th / 1383 |
| QB hurries | 7 | 24th / 1549 |
| Passes defended | 1 | 898th / 1772 |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Opp. plays | Est. snaps | Plays made | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · UT Rio Grande Valley | ✓ DL | 81 | ~48 (24–60) | 2 | · | 59% |
| Wk 2 · Texas State | ✓ DL | 78 | ~47 (23–59) | 4 | 1 | 60% |
| Wk 3 · Texas | ✓ DL | 85 | ~49 (24–62) | 2 | · | 58% |
| Wk 4 · Colorado State | ✓ DL | 78 | ~49 (24–62) | 3 | · | 63% |
| Wk 5 · Rice | ✓ DL | 60 | ~40 (20–50) | 4 | · | 67% |
| Wk 6 · South Florida | — | 61 | ~35 (14–55) | 2 | · | 57% |
| Wk 7 · Navy | ✓ DL | 56 | ~37 (14–56) | 4 | 1 | 66% |
| Wk 8 · Tulane | ✓ DL | 66 | ~38 (15–60) | 1 | · | 58% |
| Season | 7 GS | 565 | 343 (329–454) | 22 | 2 | 61% |
Position Room
15 DLs on the UTSA roster, ordered by tkl
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Tkl | TFL | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Jeremiah Bailey | DL | SR | 21 | 3.5 | 1 | — | 1 |
| 98 | Jameian Buxton | DL | SR | 16 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 99 | Tai Leonard | DL | SR | 13 | 0.5 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 91 | Jusiah Sampleton | DL | SR | 10 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 94 | Eddy Smith | DL | SO | 9 | 1.5 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 95 | Drenon Fite III | DL | SR | 9 | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 48 | Jacob Lopez-Veasey | DL | FR | 2 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 90 | Donald Quaite Jr. | DL | JR | 2 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 97 | King Justice | DL | FR | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 19 | Johnny Bowens III | DL | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | Collins Acheampong | DL | SO | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 47 | Tim Huff Jr. | DL | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 49 | Hudson Pickett | DL | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 88 | Byron Porter | DL | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 92 | Jaylan Jones | DL | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes —+ plays per team game. UTSA depth chart →