Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 6 | — |
| Target share | 4.2% | — |
| Catch rate | 100.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 100.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 16.3 | — |
| Explosive catches | 16.7% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 0 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 0 | — |
Charting
Where Armstrong's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted7 targets charted
Game Log
Kiotti Armstrong's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Missouri State | W 50–0 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2 |  Arizona State | W 48–20 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 3 |  Kentucky | L 21–31 | 4.7 | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 8 |
| 4 | @ LSU | L 6–35 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 5 |  Arkansas | W 34–7 | 7.5 | 1 | 54 | 54.0 | 0 | 54 |
| 6 | @ Missouri | L 6–27 | 4.0 | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 5 |
| 7 |  The Citadel | W 41–0 | 5.1 | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 | 11 |
| 8 | @ Alabama | L 20–31 | 6.0 | 2 | 20 | 10.0 | 0 | 13 |
| 2026 · 5 games | 5.5 | 6 | 98 | 16.3 | 0 | 54 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 6 | 1004th / 2089 |
| Yards | 98 | 778th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 16.3 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 54 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Missouri State | — | 87 | ~30 (14–43) | 1 | 34% |
| Wk 3 · Kentucky | — | 84 | ~24 (11–34) | 1 | 29% |
| Wk 5 · Arkansas | — | 68 | ~21 (10–30) | 1 | 31% |
| Wk 6 · Missouri | — | 62 | ~18 (8–26) | 1 | 29% |
| Wk 7 · The Citadel | ✓ TE | 65 | ~39 (18–56) | 1 | 60% |
| Wk 8 · Alabama | — | 61 | ~42 (36–51) | 2 | 69% |
| Season | 1 GS | 546 | 174 (133–243) | 7 | 32% |
Position Room
8 TEs on the Texas A&M roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Houston Thomas | TE | 9 | 52 | 0 | 9% | -0.15 | ||
| 9 | Kiotti Armstrong | TE | SO | 6 | 98 | 0 | 4% | +0.75 |
| 88 | Micah Riley | TE | SR | 3 | 18 | 1 | 4% | +0.79 |
| 84 | Richie Anderson III | TE | SR | 2 | 22 | 0 | 5% | +0.37 |
| 19 | KK Johnson | TE | FR | 1 | 15 | 0 | 4% | +0.52 |
| 43 | Carter Braugh | TE | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 81 | Luke Braden | TE | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 86 | Evan Jacobson | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Texas A&M depth chart →