Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 6 | — |
| Success rate | 66.7% | — |
| Explosive run rate | 16.7% | — |
| Stuffed at the line | 33.3% | — |
| First downs | 1 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 0 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 0 | — |
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 61 | — |
| Target share | 24.5% | 76th / 534 |
| Catch rate | 72.1% | 135th / 534 |
| Success rate per target | 42.6% | 365th / 534 |
| Yards per target | 8.8 | 206th / 534 |
| Explosive catches | 19.7% | 64th / 534 |
| Deep-target rate | 23.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 16 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 6 | — |
Charting
Where Jr.'s plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted59 targets charted
Career
4 seasons at 4 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Tulsa#92 · 4-4 | 8 | 77% | 43 | 535 | 4 | 24.5% |
| 2025 |  West Virginia#87 · 4-8 | 3 | 13% | 4 | 22 | 0 | 7.1% |
| 2024 |  Eastern Michigan#113 · 5-7 | 12 | 75% | 64 | 639 | 2 | 18.7% |
| 2021 |  Akron#126 · 2-10 | 7 | 16% | 11 | 112 | 1 | 10.9% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Oran Singleton Jr.'s team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Oran Singleton Jr.'s box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Rushing | Receiving | Returns | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long | KR | KR yds | PR | PR yds | TD |
| 1 |  Oklahoma State | W 24–10 | 7.7 | 1 | -9 | -9.0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 99 | 24.8 | 1 | 56 | · | · | 1 | -1 | · |
| 2 | @ Sam Houston | W 23–17 | 4.7 | · | · | · | · | · | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 0 | 21 | · | · | 1 | 0 | · |
| 3 |  East Texas A&M | W 42–0 | 6.9 | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 38 | 19.0 | 1 | 27 | · | · | 3 | 26 | · |
| 4 | @ Arkansas | L 6–34 | 6.5 | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 39 | 6.5 | 0 | 11 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 5 |  North Texas | L 44–45 | 8.5 | 2 | 22 | 11.0 | 0 | 15 | 11 | 104 | 9.5 | 0 | 24 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 6 | @ Navy | L 26–34 | 8.3 | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 81 | 16.2 | 1 | 40 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 7 | @ Rice | W 38–17 | 8.0 | · | · | · | · | · | 7 | 87 | 12.4 | 1 | 33 | · | · | 1 | 6 | · |
| 8 |  Army | L 35–38 | 6.6 | · | · | · | · | · | 5 | 61 | 12.2 | 0 | 31 | · | · | 1 | -3 | · |
| 2026 · 8 games | 7.1 | 6 | 28 | 4.7 | 0 | 15 | 43 | 535 | 12.4 | 4 | 56 | · | · | 7 | 28 | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Passing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Completions | 1 | — |
| Attempts | 3 | — |
| Completion % | 33.3% | — |
| Yards | 10 | — |
| Yards / att. | 3.3 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | — |
| Interceptions | 0 | — |
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 6 | — |
| Yards | 28 | 828th / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | 4.7 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 15 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 43 | 39th / 2089 |
| Yards | 535 | 60th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 12.4 | 236th / 460 |
| Touchdowns | 4 | 69th / 914 |
| Long | 56 | — |
| Punt returns | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Returns | 7 | — |
| Yards | 28 | — |
| Average | 4 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 14 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Special teams | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Oklahoma State | ✓ WR | 57 | ~39 (12–53) | 5 | 1 | 68% |
| Wk 2 · Sam Houston | ✓ WR | 73 | ~54 (35–66) | 7 | 1 | 74% |
| Wk 3 · East Texas A&M | ✓ WR | 70 | ~39 (12–53) | 5 | 3 | 56% |
| Wk 4 · Arkansas | ✓ WR | 55 | ~45 (30–55) | 9 | · | 82% |
| Wk 5 · North Texas | ✓ WR | 80 | ~73 (48–80) | 19 | · | 91% |
| Wk 6 · Navy | ✓ WR | 65 | ~56 (37–65) | 10 | · | 86% |
| Wk 7 · Rice | ✓ WR | 63 | ~50 (33–61) | 8 | 1 | 79% |
| Wk 8 · Army | ✓ WR | 60 | ~48 (32–58) | 7 | 1 | 80% |
| Season | 8 GS | 523 | 404 (339–471) | 70 | 7 | 77% |
Position Room
12 WRs on the Tulsa roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Oran Singleton Jr. | WR | SR | 43 | 535 | 4 | 24% | +0.38 |
| 9 | Javon Ross | WR | JR | 28 | 327 | 3 | 15% | +0.71 |
| 7 | Jimmy Calloway | WR | SR | 23 | 215 | 1 | 20% | +0.21 |
| David Wells Jr. | WR | 15 | 194 | 3 | 11% | +0.65 | ||
| 0 | Donnell Gee Jr. | WR | SO | 9 | 111 | 1 | 10% | +0.42 |
| 19 | Grayson Tempest | WR | SR | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6% | -0.60 |
| 88 | Xavier Green | WR | FR | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3% | -0.45 |
| 13 | Joshua Rushing | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | Josh Smith | WR | SO | — | — | — | 1% | -0.66 |
| 18 | Courtney Lewis Jr. | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | Kainon Gibson | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 85 | Cole Greene | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Tulsa depth chart →