Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 18 | — |
| Target share | 9.8% | 512th / 534 |
| Catch rate | 55.6% | 423rd / 534 |
| Success rate per target | 38.9% | 429th / 534 |
| Yards per target | 9.2 | 173rd / 534 |
| Explosive catches | 11.1% | 262nd / 534 |
| Deep-target rate | 27.8% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 6 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 2 | — |
Charting
Where Bond's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted19 targets charted
Game Log
Rico Bond's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ Michigan State | L 20–30 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2 |  Central Connecticut | W 63–10 | 8.8 | 4 | 135 | 33.8 | 1 | 85 |
| 3 |  Temple | W 49–48 | 6.1 | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 0 | 17 |
| 4 |  San Diego State | W 41–16 | 4.3 | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 9 |
| 5 | @ Ball State | W 39–24 | 5.1 | 2 | 14 | 7.0 | 0 | 8 |
| 6 |  Buffalo | L 8–23 | 2.5 | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 34–14 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 8 |  Western Michigan | W 45–38 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2026 · 5 games | 5.4 | 12 | 191 | 15.9 | 1 | 85 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 12 | 600th / 2089 |
| Yards | 191 | 455th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 15.9 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 412th / 914 |
| Long | 85 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Michigan State | — | 41 | ~11 (3–18) | 1 | · | 27% |
| Wk 2 · Central Connecticut | — | 77 | ~46 (30–56) | 7 | · | 60% |
| Wk 3 · Temple | ✓ WR | 76 | ~54 (35–66) | 9 | 1 | 71% |
| Wk 4 · San Diego State | — | 70 | ~11 (3–18) | 1 | · | 16% |
| Wk 5 · Ball State | — | 86 | ~44 (29–54) | 2 | · | 51% |
| Wk 6 · Buffalo | — | 61 | ~11 (3–18) | 1 | · | 18% |
| Season | 1 GS | 569 | 177 (110–215) | 21 | 1 | 31% |
Position Room
12 WRs on the Toledo roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Adjatay Dabbs | WR | JR | 40 | 592 | 7 | 25% | +0.65 |
| 12 | Bryson Hammer | WR | JR | 28 | 494 | 2 | 13% | +0.94 |
| 5 | Terrell Crosby Jr. | WR | SR | 22 | 229 | 0 | 13% | +0.10 |
| 19 | Daryl Barnett Jr. | WR | SO | 17 | 220 | 3 | 10% | +0.71 |
| 1 | Rico Bond | WR | SO | 12 | 191 | 1 | 10% | +0.46 |
| 13 | Cooper Rusk | WR | SR | 3 | 90 | 1 | 7% | +2.21 |
| 14 | Tashi Braceful | WR | SO | 1 | 11 | 0 | 7% | +0.07 |
| 85 | Anthony Simpson | WR | SR | 1 | 10 | 0 | 3% | +0.27 |
| 2 | Trenton Jones | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | Kalvin Gilbert Jr. | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 10 | Seth Elchert | WR | FR | — | — | — | 3% | -1.14 |
| 83 | Omar Mims Jr. | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Toledo depth chart →