Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS QB who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Passing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Dropbacks | 250 | — |
| Success rate | 43.2% | 77th / 181 |
| Explosive pass rate | 9.9% | 100th / 181 |
| Deep-throw rate | 7.3% | 168th / 181 |
| Sack rate | 6.8% | 133rd / 181 |
| Interception rate | 2.6% | — |
| 3rd-down conversion | 32.8% | 114th / 181 |
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 21 | — |
| Success rate | 52.4% | — |
| Explosive run rate | 38.1% | — |
| Stuffed at the line | 19.0% | — |
| First downs | 10 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 0 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 0 | — |
Charting
Where Mendoza's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he throws223 throws charted
Run direction20 carries
2025 charting · Indiana
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (4 of Mendoza’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he throws11 throws charted
Run direction10 carries
Career
3 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Cmp/Att | Pass yds | TD–INT | Y/A | Dropback SR | Car | Rush yds | Y/C | Rush TD | Rush SR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Georgia Tech#78 · 2-6 | 8 | 89% | 169/240 | 1795 | 10–6 | 7.5 | 43.2% | 43 | -34 | -0.8 | 0 | 52.4% |
| 2025 |  Indiana#1 · 16-0 | 8 | 8% | 18/24 | 286 | 5–1 | 11.9 | — | 13 | 190 | 14.6 | 1 | — |
| 2024 | Indiana#8 · 11-2 | 1 | 2% | 1/1 | 6 | 0–0 | 6.0 | — | 2 | -3 | -1.5 | 0 | — |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Alberto Mendoza's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Alberto Mendoza's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Passing | Rushing | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Cmp | Att | Pct | Yds | Y/A | TD | INT | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Colorado | L 13–14 | 6.5 | 17 | 23 | 73.9 | 237 | 10.3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | -22 | -7.3 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 |  Tennessee | L 24–45 | 3.5 | 26 | 40 | 65.0 | 221 | 5.5 | 1 | 2 | 7 | -13 | -1.9 | 0 | 8 |
| 3 |  Mercer | W 44–11 | 7.8 | 15 | 21 | 71.4 | 249 | 11.9 | 3 | 0 | 1 | -8 | -8.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | @ Stanford | L 27–34 | 6.0 | 26 | 39 | 66.7 | 268 | 6.9 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 16 | 2.0 | 0 | 22 |
| 6 |  Duke | W 28–25 | 6.5 | 23 | 30 | 76.7 | 218 | 7.3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 0 | 16 |
| 7 | @ Virginia Tech | L 24–34 | 6.4 | 29 | 38 | 76.3 | 335 | 8.8 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -37 | -6.2 | 0 | 1 |
| 8 |  Boston College | L 27–49 | 5.2 | 17 | 24 | 70.8 | 186 | 7.8 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 21 | 4.2 | 0 | 27 |
| 9 | @ Pittsburgh | L 11–34 | 2.5 | 16 | 25 | 64.0 | 81 | 3.2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | -8 | -0.7 | 0 | 13 |
| 2026 · 8 games | 5.6 | 169 | 240 | 70.4 | 1795 | 7.5 | 10 | 6 | 43 | -34 | -0.8 | 0 | 27 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Passing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Completions | 169 | — |
| Attempts | 240 | — |
| Completion % | 70.4% | 11th / 146 |
| Yards | 1795 | 44th / 276 |
| Yards / att. | 7.5 | 72nd / 146 |
| Touchdowns | 10 | 71st / 276 |
| Interceptions | 6 | — |
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 43 | — |
| Yards | -34 | 1504th / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | -0.8 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 27 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 7 | — |
| Lost | 1 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps: every offensive play credited to the QB running the offense. Close to a true snap count
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Colorado | — | 54 | 46 | 24 | · | 85% |
| Wk 2 · Tennessee | — | 71 | 71 | 47 | · | 100% |
| Wk 3 · Mercer | ✓ QB | 62 | 55 | 22 | · | 89% |
| Wk 4 · Stanford | ✓ QB | 70 | 70 | 47 | · | 100% |
| Wk 6 · Duke | — | 57 | 57 | 33 | 1 | 100% |
| Wk 7 · Virginia Tech | — | 59 | 59 | 44 | · | 100% |
| Wk 8 · Boston College | — | 60 | 47 | 27 | · | 78% |
| Wk 9 · Pittsburgh | — | 76 | 49 | 37 | · | 64% |
| Season | 2 GS | 509 | 454 | 281 | 1 | 89% |
Position Room
5 QBs on the Georgia Tech roster, ordered by att
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Att | Yds | TD | INT | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | Alberto Mendoza | QB | JR | 240 | 1795 | 10 | 6 | +0.17 |
| 9 | Grady Adamson | QB | SO | 27 | 135 | 1 | 0 | +0.02 |
| 12 | Cole Bergeron | QB | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | Graham Knowles | QB | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | Ben Guthrie | QB | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 12+ plays per team game. Georgia Tech depth chart →