EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 29 | — |
| Success rate | 58.6% | 34th / 293 |
| Explosive run rate | 13.8% | 139th / 293 |
| Stuffed at the line | 0.0% | 1st / 293 |
| First downs | 10 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 1 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 0 | — |
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 29 | — |
| Yards | 228 | 51st / 1194 |
| Yards / carry | 7.9 | 19th / 329 |
| Touchdowns | 3 | 36th / 476 |
| Long | 53 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 2 | 991st / 1676 |
| Yards | 0 | — |
| Yards / catch | 0 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 1 | — |
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · California | ✓ RB | 53 | ~19 (13–25) | 9 | 36% |
| Wk 2 · San Diego State | ✓ RB | 67 | ~19 (13–25) | 8 | 28% |
| Wk 3 · Purdue | — | 80 | ~24 (16–31) | 14 | 30% |
| Season | 2 GS | 200 | 62 (44–76) | 31 | 31% |
6 RBs on the UCLA roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Wayne Knight | RB | SR | 39 | 345 | 8.8 | 8 | 5 | +0.74 |
| Anthony Woods | RB | 29 | 228 | 7.9 | 3 | 2 | +0.39 | ||
| Jaivian Thomas | RB | 21 | 131 | 6.2 | 2 | 2 | +0.40 | ||
| 22 | Dylan Lee | RB | JR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | Troy Leigber | RB | SR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | Karson Cox | RB | SO | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. UCLA depth chart →