Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 104 | — |
| Success rate | 49.0% | 90th / 332 |
| Explosive run rate | 16.3% | 80th / 332 |
| Stuffed at the line | 15.4% | 161st / 332 |
| First downs | 28 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 17 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 4 | — |
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 14 | — |
| Target share | 5.5% | — |
| Catch rate | 64.3% | — |
| Success rate per target | 35.7% | — |
| Yards per target | 4.8 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 7.1% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 1 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Charting
Where Miller's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted14 targets charted
Run direction105 carries
Game Log
CJ Miller's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Rushing | Receiving | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ Michigan State | L 20–30 | 3.9 | 8 | 22 | 2.8 | 0 | 12 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 2 |  Central Connecticut | W 63–10 | 6.5 | 9 | 56 | 6.2 | 1 | 14 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 3 |  Temple | W 49–48 | 5.9 | 9 | 33 | 3.7 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 15 | 3.8 | 1 | 10 |
| 4 |  San Diego State | W 41–16 | 6.1 | 8 | 39 | 4.9 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 18 | 18.0 | 0 | 18 |
| 5 | @ Ball State | W 39–24 | 9.2 | 20 | 196 | 9.8 | 2 | 68 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 6 |  Buffalo | L 8–23 | 5.8 | 9 | 32 | 3.6 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 0 | 16 |
| 7 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 34–14 | 6.6 | 13 | 48 | 3.7 | 2 | 17 | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 2 |
| 8 |  Western Michigan | W 45–38 | 8.3 | 33 | 183 | 5.5 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 0 | 13 |
| 2026 · 8 games | 6.5 | 109 | 609 | 5.6 | 7 | 68 | 9 | 67 | 7.4 | 1 | 18 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 109 | — |
| Yards | 609 | 47th / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | 5.6 | 66th / 312 |
| Touchdowns | 7 | 36th / 683 |
| Long | 68 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 9 | 761st / 2089 |
| Yards | 67 | 995th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 7.4 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 412th / 914 |
| Long | 18 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 1 | 4438th / 5664 |
| Solo | 1 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 1 | — |
| Lost | 1 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Plays made | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Michigan State | ✓ RB | 41 | ~18 (12–23) | 9 | · | 44% |
| Wk 2 · Central Connecticut | — | 77 | ~22 (15–29) | 10 | · | 29% |
| Wk 3 · Temple | ✓ RB | 76 | ~30 (20–39) | 13 | · | 39% |
| Wk 4 · San Diego State | — | 70 | ~16 (11–21) | 9 | · | 23% |
| Wk 5 · Ball State | — | 86 | ~38 (26–49) | 22 | · | 44% |
| Wk 6 · Buffalo | ✓ RB | 61 | ~22 (15–29) | 11 | · | 36% |
| Wk 7 · Eastern Michigan | — | 70 | ~26 (18–34) | 15 | · | 37% |
| Wk 8 · Western Michigan | ✓ RB | 88 | ~66 (56–73) | 34 | 1 | 75% |
| Season | 4 GS | 569 | 238 (189–294) | 123 | 1 | 42% |
Position Room
8 RBs on the Toledo roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | CJ Miller | RB | JR | 109 | 609 | 5.6 | 7 | 9 | +0.21 |
| Connor Walendzak | RB | 73 | 424 | 5.8 | 7 | 12 | +0.14 | ||
| 4 | Autavius Ison | RB | JR | 67 | 323 | 4.8 | 3 | 2 | -0.06 |
| 23 | Noah Sanders | RB | FR | 10 | 42 | 4.2 | 0 | 1 | -0.02 |
| 20 | Corey Smith | RB | SO | 7 | 30 | 4.3 | 0 | — | +0.24 |
| Kadale Williams | RB | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | — | -0.22 | ||
| 27 | Dane Nauman | RB | SO | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | — | +0.46 |
| 29 | Tanner Rubinstein | FB | SR | — | — | — | — | 1 | +1.08 |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. Toledo depth chart →