Snap share
36%
1 of 3 started · likely 25–44%
Rush yards
172
111th of 1194 in FBS
Yards / carry
6.9
38th of 329 in FBS
Rush TD
4
13th of 476 in FBS
Receptions
5
500th of 1676 in FBS
EPA / play
+0.38
44th of 257 RBs
Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 22 | — |
| Success rate | 50.0% | 86th / 293 |
| Explosive run rate | 13.6% | 142nd / 293 |
| Stuffed at the line | 18.2% | 204th / 293 |
| First downs | 8 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 7 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 3 | — |
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 7 | — |
| Target share | 7.7% | — |
| Catch rate | 71.4% | — |
| Success rate per target | 28.6% | — |
| Yards per target | 4.4 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 3 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 2 | — |
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 25 | — |
| Yards | 172 | 111th / 1194 |
| Yards / carry | 6.9 | 38th / 329 |
| Touchdowns | 4 | 13th / 476 |
| Long | 71 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 5 | 500th / 1676 |
| Yards | 31 | 858th / 1662 |
| Yards / catch | 6.2 | — |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 54th / 527 |
| Long | 13 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 1 | 3473rd / 4521 |
| Solo | 0 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Plays made | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Michigan State | — | 41 | ~19 (13–25) | 10 | · | 46% |
| Wk 2 · Central Connecticut | ✓ RB | 77 | ~15 (10–19) | 7 | 1 | 19% |
| Wk 3 · Temple | — | 76 | ~35 (24–45) | 15 | · | 46% |
| Season | 1 GS | 194 | 69 (49–85) | 32 | 1 | 36% |
Position Room
8 RBs on the Toledo roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | CJ Miller | RB | JR | 26 | 111 | 4.3 | 2 | 4 | +0.10 |
| Connor Walendzak | RB | 25 | 172 | 6.9 | 4 | 5 | +0.38 | ||
| 4 | Autavius Ison | RB | JR | 12 | 43 | 3.6 | 1 | — | +0.00 |
| 20 | Corey Smith | RB | SO | 7 | 30 | 4.3 | 0 | — | +0.24 |
| 23 | Noah Sanders | RB | FR | 4 | 26 | 6.5 | 0 | — | +0.09 |
| Kadale Williams | RB | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | — | -0.22 | ||
| 27 | Dane Nauman | RB | SO | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | — | +0.46 |
| 29 | Tanner Rubinstein | FB | SR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. Toledo depth chart →