EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 6 | — |
| Target share | 10.5% | — |
| Catch rate | 83.3% | — |
| Success rate per target | 83.3% | — |
| Yards per target | 13.7 | — |
| Explosive catches | 33.3% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 16.7% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 2 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 2 | — |
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 6 | 398th / 1676 |
| Yards | 97 | 323rd / 1662 |
| Yards / catch | 16.2 | 101st / 499 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 54th / 527 |
| Long | 30 | — |
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Liberty | ✓ TE | 49 | ~38 (18–49) | 2 | 78% |
| Wk 2 · Wagner | ✓ TE | 62 | ~34 (16–49) | 2 | 55% |
| Wk 3 · San Diego State | ✓ TE | 74 | ~57 (48–69) | 3 | 77% |
| Season | 3 GS | 185 | 129 (109–156) | 7 | 70% |
8 TEs on the James Madison roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Cole Keller | TE | SR | 6 | 97 | 2 | 9% | +1.75 |
| 13 | KD Mosley | TE | JR | 1 | 20 | 1 | 4% | +3.12 |
| 85 | Ryder Post | TE | JR | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4% | -0.16 |
| 44 | Max Roche | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 82 | Thatcher Miller | TE | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 84 | Brian Hnat | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 86 | Ethan Gurela | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | Thomas Guillemette | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. James Madison depth chart →