Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 27 | — |
| Target share | 13.1% | 408th / 534 |
| Catch rate | 66.7% | 218th / 534 |
| Success rate per target | 59.3% | 84th / 534 |
| Yards per target | 8.4 | 235th / 534 |
| Explosive catches | 18.5% | 82nd / 534 |
| Deep-target rate | 18.5% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 7 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 4 | — |
Charting
Where Richardson's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted28 targets charted
Game Log
Jared Richardson's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Tulane | W 17–3 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2 | @ Illinois | W 31–27 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 3 |  Stanford | W 35–7 | 6.4 | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 0 | 22 |
| 4 |  William & Mary | W 62–7 | 6.7 | 2 | 38 | 19.0 | 1 | 28 |
| 6 | @ Georgia Tech | L 25–28 | 6.6 | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 1 | 13 |
| 7 |  North Carolina | L 20–24 | 6.7 | 3 | 55 | 18.3 | 0 | 24 |
| 8 | @ Virginia | W 19–16 | 6.6 | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 0 | 31 |
| 9 |  Boston College | W 47–2 | 5.0 | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 0 | 8 |
| 2026 · 6 games | 6.3 | 18 | 226 | 12.6 | 2 | 31 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 18 | 367th / 2089 |
| Yards | 226 | 383rd / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 12.6 | 224th / 460 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 223rd / 914 |
| Long | 31 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 1 | 4438th / 5664 |
| Solo | 1 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Plays made | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Tulane | ✓ WR | 76 | ~40 (26–49) | 2 | · | 53% |
| Wk 3 · Stanford | ✓ WR | 71 | ~41 (27–50) | 4 | · | 58% |
| Wk 4 · William & Mary | ✓ WR | 71 | ~20 (6–27) | 2 | · | 28% |
| Wk 6 · Georgia Tech | — | 76 | ~58 (38–71) | 7 | · | 76% |
| Wk 7 · North Carolina | — | 71 | ~41 (27–50) | 4 | · | 58% |
| Wk 8 · Virginia | — | 50 | ~41 (27–50) | 6 | 1 | 82% |
| Wk 9 · Boston College | — | 66 | ~38 (12–52) | 3 | · | 58% |
| Season | 3 GS | 537 | 279 (173–339) | 28 | 1 | 52% |
Position Room
13 WRs on the Duke roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Jonah Burton | WR | SR | 21 | 299 | 1 | 13% | +0.55 |
| 17 | Jared Richardson | WR | SR | 18 | 226 | 2 | 13% | +0.51 |
| 4 | Jaivon Solomon | WR | FR | 11 | 207 | 1 | 10% | +0.72 |
| 7 | Kavon Simmons | WR | FR | 8 | 97 | 1 | 8% | +0.59 |
| 8 | Jayden Moore | WR | SO | 7 | 111 | 1 | 9% | +0.06 |
| 18 | Brody Keefe | WR | FR | 6 | 85 | 2 | 11% | +0.57 |
| 5 | Javen Nicholas | WR | SR | 4 | 57 | 0 | 5% | +0.71 |
| 9 | Kavon Conciauro | WR | FR | 1 | 12 | 0 | 6% | +0.40 |
| 88 | Paxon Kettering | WR | SO | 1 | 32 | 0 | 3% | +3.14 |
| 1 | Jamien Little | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 3 | Blake Rohrer | WR | SR | — | — | — | 3% | -0.83 |
| 21 | Qeanu Johnson | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | Jackson Maggiore | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Duke depth chart →