Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Defense | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Havoc plays | 3 | 1078th / 2758 |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Run stops | 5 | 1669th / 3422 |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| Pass breakups | 3 | — |
| Interceptions | 0 | — |
| Forced fumbles | 0 | — |
| Tackles | 24 | — |
Charting
Where Loud's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
The play-by-play names the defender on breakups, interceptions and tackles, but not the man in coverage on every throw, so true times-targeted isn't in the text. Coverage plays is the closest stand-in; exact targets come from hand charting.
Game Log
Kyon Loud's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Defense | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | Hur | PD | INT | TD |
| 1 |  Tulane | W 17–3 | 5.8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | · | · |
| 2 | @ Illinois | W 31–27 | 6.6 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | · | · |
| 3 |  Stanford | W 35–7 | 5.2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | · | · |
| 4 |  William & Mary | W 62–7 | 5.6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | · | · |
| 6 | @ Georgia Tech | L 25–28 | 6.2 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 7 |  North Carolina | L 20–24 | 6.2 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 8 | @ Virginia | W 19–16 | 5.3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 9 |  Boston College | W 47–2 | 4.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 2026 · 8 games | 5.7 | 27 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | · | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 27 | 841st / 5664 |
| Solo | 16 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 1 | 780th / 1549 |
| Passes defended | 3 | 237th / 1772 |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Opp. plays | Est. snaps | Plays made | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Tulane | ✓ CB | 54 | ~54 (22–54) | 3 | · | 100% |
| Wk 2 · Illinois | ✓ CB | 68 | ~64 (26–68) | 6 | · | 94% |
| Wk 3 · Stanford | ✓ CB | 58 | ~14 (0–43) | 2 | · | 24% |
| Wk 4 · William & Mary | ✓ CB | 49 | ~46 (19–49) | 2 | · | 94% |
| Wk 6 · Georgia Tech | — | 57 | ~56 (23–57) | 6 | 1 | 98% |
| Wk 7 · North Carolina | ✓ CB | 64 | ~63 (25–64) | 5 | · | 98% |
| Wk 8 · Virginia | — | 77 | ~58 (23–61) | 3 | 1 | 75% |
| Wk 9 · Boston College | — | 59 | ~14 (0–43) | 2 | · | 24% |
| Season | 5 GS | 486 | 369 (280–410) | 29 | 2 | 76% |
Position Room
16 DBs on the Duke roster, ordered by tkl
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Tkl | TFL | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | DaShawn Stone | S | JR | 39 | 1 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 35 | Andrew Pellicciotta | S | SO | 33 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 0 | Dylan Flowers | CB | SR | 31 | 0.5 | 0 | — | 3 |
| 1 | Kyon Loud | CB | SO | 27 | 0 | 0 | — | 3 |
| 2 | Patrick Smith-Young | S | SR | 23 | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 9 | Che Ojarikre | CB | SR | 16 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 |
| 4 | Evan Smith | CB | SR | 9 | 1.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 21 | KD Cotton | S | FR | 8 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 5 | Kimari Robinson | CB | JR | 5 | 1.5 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 3 | Landan Callahan | CB | SO | 4 | 0 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 6 | Leon Griffin III | S | JR | 4 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 28 | Kaleb Lanier | CB | FR | 4 | 0 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 26 | Tyson Sanford | CB | FR | 2 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 23 | Kolbe Harmon | CB | FR | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 29 | Brady Winter | S | FR | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 37 | Lyrik Pettis | S | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes —+ plays per team game. Duke depth chart →