Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 38 | — |
| Target share | 14.7% | 346th / 534 |
| Catch rate | 65.8% | 243rd / 534 |
| Success rate per target | 52.6% | 183rd / 534 |
| Yards per target | 5.9 | 441st / 534 |
| Explosive catches | 2.6% | 488th / 534 |
| Deep-target rate | 2.6% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 11 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 3 | — |
Charting
Where Lindenmeyer's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted40 targets charted
2025 charting · Nebraska
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (5 of Lindenmeyer’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted10 targets charted
Career
4 seasons since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Nebraska#20 · 5-3 | 8 | 76% | 27 | 247 | 1 | 14.7% |
| 2025 | Nebraska#61 · 7-6 | 11 | 56% | 29 | 312 | 2 | 12.3% |
| 2024 | Nebraska#39 · 7-6 | 4 | 10% | 5 | 50 | 0 | 4.9% |
| 2023 | Nebraska#63 · 5-7 | 1 | 2% | — | — | — | — |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Luke Lindenmeyer's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Luke Lindenmeyer's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Ohio | W 49–21 | 6.1 | 2 | 22 | 11.0 | 0 | 15 |
| 2 |  Bowling Green | W 56–7 | 5.7 | 2 | 16 | 8.0 | 0 | 13 |
| 3 |  North Dakota | W 34–7 | 6.6 | 1 | 33 | 33.0 | 0 | 33 |
| 4 | @ Michigan State | W 31–13 | 6.5 | 4 | 25 | 6.3 | 0 | 15 |
| 5 |  Maryland | W 48–23 | 7.0 | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 1 | 12 |
| 6 |  Indiana | L 17–20 | 7.6 | 7 | 45 | 6.4 | 0 | 12 |
| 7 | @ Oregon | L 14–17 | 6.4 | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 0 | 11 |
| 9 |  Washington | L 10–17 | 7.9 | 5 | 61 | 12.2 | 0 | 14 |
| 2026 · 8 games | 6.7 | 27 | 247 | 9.1 | 1 | 33 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 27 | 185th / 2089 |
| Yards | 247 | 351st / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 9.1 | 399th / 460 |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 412th / 914 |
| Long | 33 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Ohio | ✓ TE | 74 | ~54 (46–65) | 3 | · | 73% |
| Wk 2 · Bowling Green | ✓ TE | 66 | ~52 (44–63) | 3 | · | 79% |
| Wk 3 · North Dakota | ✓ TE | 71 | ~39 (18–56) | 2 | · | 55% |
| Wk 4 · Michigan State | ✓ TE | 67 | ~56 (47–67) | 7 | · | 84% |
| Wk 5 · Maryland | ✓ TE | 75 | ~59 (50–71) | 4 | 1 | 79% |
| Wk 6 · Indiana | — | 83 | ~67 (57–81) | 8 | · | 81% |
| Wk 7 · Oregon | ✓ TE | 67 | ~50 (42–60) | 5 | · | 75% |
| Wk 9 · Washington | — | 72 | ~58 (49–70) | 8 | · | 81% |
| Season | 6 GS | 575 | 435 (372–520) | 40 | 1 | 76% |
Position Room
6 TEs on the Nebraska roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44 | Luke Lindenmeyer | TE | SR | 27 | 247 | 1 | 14% | +0.26 |
| 29 | Carter Nelson | TE | JR | 2 | 30 | 1 | 3% | +0.78 |
| 41 | Luke Sorensen | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 48 | Cayden Echternach | TE | SR | — | — | — | 3% | -0.84 |
| 49 | Danny King | TE | JR | — | — | — | 4% | -0.74 |
| 82 | Eric Ingwerson | TE | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Nebraska depth chart →