EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 22 | — |
| Target share | 26.5% | 60th / 489 |
| Catch rate | 72.7% | 153rd / 489 |
| Success rate per target | 54.5% | 192nd / 489 |
| Yards per target | 7.8 | 266th / 489 |
| Explosive catches | 9.1% | 285th / 489 |
| Deep-target rate | 4.5% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 3 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 6 | — |
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 16 | 49th / 1676 |
| Yards | 172 | 127th / 1662 |
| Yards / catch | 10.8 | 301st / 499 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 54th / 527 |
| Long | 30 | — |
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Oregon State | ✓ TE | 72 | ~63 (53–72) | 8 | 88% |
| Wk 2 · Southern | ✓ TE | 64 | ~47 (40–57) | 4 | 73% |
| Wk 3 · Texas Tech | ✓ TE | 75 | ~63 (53–75) | 10 | 84% |
| Season | 3 GS | 211 | 173 (147–209) | 22 | 82% |
7 TEs on the Houston roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Patrick Overmyer | TE | SR | 16 | 172 | 2 | 24% | +0.65 |
| 19 | Kaleb Thomas | TE | JR | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3% | -0.17 |
| 87 | Luke McGary | TE | SR | 1 | 10 | 0 | 5% | +0.96 |
| 85 | Traville Frederick Jr. | TE | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 86 | Wyatt Herbel | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 88 | Jacory Thurman | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | Jaivion Martin | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Houston depth chart →