EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 14 | — |
| Target share | 12.2% | 385th / 489 |
| Catch rate | 78.6% | 94th / 489 |
| Success rate per target | 57.1% | 150th / 489 |
| Yards per target | 6.4 | 353rd / 489 |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | 382nd / 489 |
| Deep-target rate | 14.3% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 3 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 11 | 154th / 1676 |
| Yards | 89 | 362nd / 1662 |
| Yards / catch | 8.1 | 412th / 499 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 17 | — |
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Charleston Southern | ✓ TE | 79 | ~50 (42–60) | 4 | 63% |
| Wk 2 · Clemson | ✓ TE | 66 | ~53 (45–64) | 6 | 80% |
| Wk 3 · Jacksonville State | ✓ TE | 72 | ~56 (47–68) | 4 | 78% |
| Season | 3 GS | 217 | 159 (135–192) | 14 | 73% |
7 TEs on the Georgia Southern roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87 | River Helms | TE | SR | 11 | 89 | 0 | 11% | +0.55 |
| 48 | Aubrey Heath | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 80 | JQ Crosby | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 82 | Jackson Long | TE | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 83 | Jack Berquist | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 84 | JP Mikhael | TE | SR | — | — | — | 4% | -0.76 |
| 86 | Henry Gregory | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Georgia Southern depth chart →