EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 5 | — |
| Target share | 7.1% | — |
| Catch rate | 60.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 40.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 7.6 | — |
| Explosive catches | 20.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 0 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 0 | — |
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 3 | 788th / 1676 |
| Yards | 38 | 748th / 1662 |
| Yards / catch | 12.7 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 24 | — |
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Michigan State | ✓ TE | 41 | · | · | 1 | — |
| Wk 2 · Central Connecticut | — | 77 | ~45 (38–54) | 1 | · | 58% |
| Wk 3 · Temple | ✓ TE | 76 | ~48 (41–58) | 4 | · | 63% |
| Season | 2 GS | 153 | 93 (79–112) | 5 | 1 | 61% |
5 TEs on the Toledo roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43 | Sam Lee | TE | SR | 3 | 38 | 0 | 6% | -0.42 |
| 88 | Jacob Newell | TE | SR | 3 | 36 | 1 | 6% | +1.58 |
| 80 | Peyton Strickland | TE | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 81 | Ethan Malafa | TE | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 87 | Tucker Kelleher | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Toledo depth chart →