Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 6 | — |
| Target share | 3.6% | — |
| Catch rate | 83.3% | — |
| Success rate per target | 83.3% | — |
| Yards per target | 9.2 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 2 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Charting
Where Chukwurah's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted11 targets charted
Game Log
TJ Chukwurah's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ Indiana | L 16–52 | 5.1 | 2 | 14 | 7.0 | 0 | 8 |
| 2 |  UNLV | W 44–6 | 6.2 | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 0 | 23 |
| 3 | @ Texas State | L 35–49 | 4.3 | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 9 |
| 4 |  Houston Christian | W 63–14 | 6.4 | 2 | 28 | 14.0 | 1 | 14 |
| 5 | @ Tulsa | W 45–44 | — | · | · | · | · | · |
| 6 |  Charlotte | W 50–10 | 4.3 | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 9 |
| 8 | @ Navy | W 49–39 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 9 |  Florida Atlantic | W 48–41 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2026 · 6 games | 5.3 | 8 | 101 | 12.6 | 1 | 23 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 1 | — |
| Yards | 5 | 1205th / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | 5 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 5 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 8 | 841st / 2089 |
| Yards | 101 | 764th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 12.6 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 412th / 914 |
| Long | 23 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Indiana | 67 | ~36 (11–49) | 2 | 54% |
| Wk 2 · UNLV | 67 | ~25 (8–34) | 3 | 37% |
| Wk 3 · Texas State | 85 | ~8 (2–13) | 1 | 9% |
| Wk 4 · Houston Christian | 66 | ~18 (6–25) | 2 | 27% |
| Wk 5 · Tulsa | 84 | ~18 (6–25) | 2 | 21% |
| Wk 6 · Charlotte | 70 | ~10 (3–16) | 2 | 14% |
| Season | 576 | 115 (71–140) | 12 | 20% |
Position Room
13 WRs on the North Texas roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | Justin Stevenson | WR | SR | 50 | 781 | 8 | 22% | +0.83 |
| 14 | Kyle Koch | WR | JR | 28 | 324 | 6 | 16% | +0.85 |
| 0 | Corri Milliner | WR | SR | 20 | 325 | 1 | 16% | +0.58 |
| 6 | Josiah Martin | WR | JR | 15 | 182 | 0 | 8% | +0.13 |
| 80 | Baron Tipton | WR | JR | 14 | 208 | 3 | 7% | +0.99 |
| 3 | TJ Chukwurah | WR | SR | 8 | 101 | 1 | 5% | +0.98 |
| 19 | Grayson O'Bara | WR | SR | 5 | 88 | 0 | 8% | +0.24 |
| 11 | Dalton Carnes | WR | SR | 4 | 72 | 0 | 6% | +0.67 |
| 8 | Shandon King | WR | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | James Tyre | WR | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | Lathon Latiolais | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 84 | Jackson Muckelroy | WR | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 87 | Eli Nikolas | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. North Texas depth chart →