Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 5 | — |
| Target share | 4.2% | — |
| Catch rate | 60.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 40.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 4.6 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 1 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Charting
Where Gibbs's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted5 targets charted
Game Log
Trevor Gibbs's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  North Texas | W 52–16 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2 |  Howard | W 55–0 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 3 |  Western Kentucky | W 38–0 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 4 |  Northwestern | W 29–23 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 5 | @ Rutgers | W 47–15 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 6 | @ Nebraska | W 20–17 | 6.0 | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 0 | 13 |
| 7 |  Ohio State | L 15–19 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 8 | @ Michigan | W 13–6 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 9 |  Minnesota | W 23–16 | 2.8 | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 2 |
| 2026 · 2 games | 4.4 | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 0 | 13 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 3 | 1350th / 2089 |
| Yards | 23 | 1474th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 7.7 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 13 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 4 · Northwestern | ✓ TE | 69 | · | · | — |
| Wk 5 · Rutgers | — | 68 | ~40 (34–48) | 1 | 59% |
| Wk 6 · Nebraska | — | 44 | ~34 (16–44) | 2 | 77% |
| Wk 7 · Ohio State | — | 69 | ~42 (36–51) | 1 | 61% |
| Wk 8 · Michigan | ✓ TE | 53 | · | · | — |
| Wk 9 · Minnesota | ✓ TE | 69 | ~25 (12–36) | 1 | 36% |
| Season | 3 GS | 545 | 141 (97–190) | 5 | 26% |
Position Room
6 TEs on the Indiana roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39 | Trevor Gibbs | TE | FR | 3 | 23 | 0 | 4% | +0.17 |
| 88 | Brock Schott | TE | SO | 3 | 54 | 0 | 5% | +1.04 |
| 85 | Andrew Barker | TE | SO | 1 | 6 | 0 | 3% | +0.05 |
| 18 | Parker Elmore | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 84 | Blake Thiry | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 87 | PJ MacFarlane | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Indiana depth chart →