EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 7 | — |
| Target share | 12.1% | — |
| Catch rate | 85.7% | — |
| Success rate per target | 42.9% | — |
| Yards per target | 4.6 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 1 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 0 | — |
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 6 | 398th / 1676 |
| Yards | 32 | 845th / 1662 |
| Yards / catch | 5.3 | 473rd / 499 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 10 | — |
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Michigan | ✓ TE | 67 | ~30 (14–43) | 2 | 45% |
| Wk 2 · Monmouth | ✓ TE | 57 | ~28 (13–40) | 3 | 49% |
| Wk 3 · Rice | ✓ TE | 63 | ~40 (34–48) | 2 | 63% |
| Season | 3 GS | 187 | 98 (54–131) | 7 | 52% |
8 TEs on the Western Michigan roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | Adam Parks | TE | JR | 6 | 32 | 0 | 10% | +0.00 |
| 88 | Nate Levicki | TE | SR | 3 | 32 | 0 | 9% | -0.32 |
| 83 | Ryan Brotherton | TE | SO | 1 | 21 | 1 | 4% | +2.89 |
| 35 | Enese Tonga | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | Nathan Sines | TE | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 81 | Michael Dersa | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 86 | Ryan Rocheleau | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 87 | Brady Rhoad | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Western Michigan depth chart →