Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 13 | — |
| Target share | 10.1% | — |
| Catch rate | 69.2% | — |
| Success rate per target | 46.2% | — |
| Yards per target | 6.7 | — |
| Explosive catches | 7.7% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 2 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 2 | — |
Charting
Where Parks's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted14 targets charted
Career
3 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Western Michigan#82 · 6-3 | 9 | 37% | 10 | 98 | 2 | 10.1% |
| 2025 |  New Mexico State#127 · 4-8 | 1 | 2% | 1 | 7 | 0 | 3.4% |
| 2024 | New Mexico State#129 · 3-9 | 2 | 12% | 2 | 58 | 0 | 2.9% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Adam Parks's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Adam Parks's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | Defense | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | Hur | PD | INT | TD |
| 1 | @ Michigan | L 12–13 | 5.1 | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 0 | 7 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| 2 |  Monmouth | W 49–14 | 5.4 | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 0 | 8 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| 3 | @ Rice | W 28–21 | 5.3 | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 0 | 10 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| 4 |  Boise State | L 7–32 | 5.5 | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 5 | @ Buffalo | W 20–17 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 6 |  Kent State | W 38–7 | 8.8 | 3 | 55 | 18.3 | 2 | 42 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| 7 | @ Central Michigan | W 21–14 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 8 | @ Toledo | L 38–45 | — | · | · | · | · | · | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 9 |  Bowling Green | W 23–10 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 2026 · 6 games | 6.0 | 10 | 98 | 9.8 | 2 | 42 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 10 | 705th / 2089 |
| Yards | 98 | 778th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 9.8 | — |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 223rd / 914 |
| Long | 42 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 2 | 3934th / 5664 |
| Solo | 2 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Plays made | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Michigan | ✓ TE | 67 | ~30 (14–43) | 2 | · | 45% |
| Wk 2 · Monmouth | ✓ TE | 57 | ~28 (13–40) | 3 | · | 49% |
| Wk 3 · Rice | ✓ TE | 63 | ~40 (34–48) | 2 | · | 63% |
| Wk 4 · Boise State | ✓ TE | 51 | ~16 (7–23) | 1 | 1 | 31% |
| Wk 5 · Buffalo | ✓ TE | 61 | · | · | · | — |
| Wk 6 · Kent State | — | 64 | ~29 (13–41) | 3 | · | 45% |
| Wk 7 · Central Michigan | ✓ TE | 53 | · | · | · | — |
| Wk 8 · Toledo | ✓ TE | 62 | ~25 (12–36) | 1 | 1 | 40% |
| Wk 9 · Bowling Green | — | 57 | ~31 (14–44) | 2 | · | 54% |
| Season | 7 GS | 535 | 199 (152–278) | 14 | 2 | 37% |
Position Room
9 TEs on the Western Michigan roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88 | Nate Levicki | TE | SR | 13 | 162 | 1 | 9% | +0.43 |
| 15 | Adam Parks | TE | JR | 10 | 98 | 2 | 8% | +0.43 |
| 83 | Ryan Brotherton | TE | SO | 4 | 46 | 2 | 6% | +0.94 |
| 35 | Enese Tonga | TE | SO | 1 | 12 | 0 | 5% | -0.04 |
| 40 | Nathan Sines | TE | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 81 | Michael Dersa | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 86 | Ryan Rocheleau | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 87 | Brady Rhoad | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| Brennan Wooten | TE | — | — | — | 4% | -0.32 |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Western Michigan depth chart →