Snap share
70%
likely 8–100%
Tackles
4
2085th of 4521 in FBS
Solo
2
Tackles for loss
0
Sacks
0
Interceptions
0

Advanced

Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume

DefenseValueFBS rank
Havoc plays0—
Tackles for loss0—
Run stops11815th / 2586
Sacks0—
Pass breakups0—
Interceptions0—
Forced fumbles0—
Tackles4—

2026 Season Stats

FBS rank among qualifying players

Defense2026FBS rank
Tackles42085th / 4521
Solo2—
Tackles for loss0—
Sacks0—
QB hurries0—
Passes defended0—
Defensive TD0—

Snaps by Game

Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works

GameOpp. playsEst. snapsPlays madeSnap share
Wk 3 · Kentucky53~37 (4–53)470%
Season5337 (4–53)470%

Position Room

10 LBs on the Texas A&M roster, ordered by tkl

#PlayerPosClassTklTFLSacksINTPD
0Noah MikhailLBSO1800—0
21Ray ConeyLBSR181.50—0
54Jordan LockhartLBJR400—0
Daymion SanfordLB400—0
Tamarion WatkinsLB410—0
32Tank KingLBFR100—0
33Storm MillerLBFR—————
34Kyle GarvisLBJR—————
45Tommy ColliganLBSR—————
46Qui BeckLBFR—————

Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes —+ plays per team game. Texas A&M depth chart →