Snap share
50%
likely 27–67%
Receptions
5
500th of 1676 in FBS
Rec. yards
40
726th of 1662 in FBS
Yards / catch
8.0
Rec. TD
1
158th of 527 in FBS
EPA / play
+1.88
1 plays
Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 6 | — |
| Target share | 7.1% | — |
| Catch rate | 66.7% | — |
| Success rate per target | 66.7% | — |
| Yards per target | 5.3 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 0 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 2 | — |
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 5 | 500th / 1676 |
| Yards | 40 | 726th / 1662 |
| Yards / catch | 8 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 158th / 527 |
| Long | 10 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Miami (OH) | 75 | ~47 (40–57) | 3 | 63% |
| Wk 2 · UCF | 71 | ~29 (13–41) | 2 | 41% |
| Wk 3 · Syracuse | 60 | ~27 (13–39) | 2 | 45% |
| Season | 206 | 103 (56–137) | 7 | 50% |
Position Room
5 TEs on the Pittsburgh roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | Elijah Lagg | TE | SR | 5 | 40 | 1 | 2% | +1.88 |
| 86 | Carson Kent | TE | SR | 5 | 97 | 0 | — | — |
| 18 | Max Hunt | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | Truitt Brown | TE | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | Adam Howanitz | TE | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Pittsburgh depth chart →