Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 58 | — |
| Target share | 19.9% | 164th / 534 |
| Catch rate | 56.9% | 407th / 534 |
| Success rate per target | 46.6% | 295th / 534 |
| Yards per target | 6.0 | 440th / 534 |
| Explosive catches | 5.2% | 446th / 534 |
| Deep-target rate | 15.5% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 16 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 10 | — |
Charting
Where Mack's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted57 targets charted
2025 charting · Eastern Michigan
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (4 of Mack’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted20 targets charted
Career
2 seasons since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Eastern Michigan#124 · 4-5 | 8 | 69% | 34 | 367 | 4 | 19.9% |
| 2025 | Eastern Michigan#117 · 4-8 | 5 | 27% | 20 | 333 | 2 | 14.9% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Harold Mack's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Harold Mack's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Sacramento State | W 28–17 | 5.1 | 2 | 14 | 7.0 | 0 | 9 |
| 1 |  San José State | L 21–27 | 7.7 | 7 | 72 | 10.3 | 1 | 34 |
| 2 | @ Michigan State | L 7–35 | 5.1 | 5 | 49 | 9.8 | 0 | 20 |
| 3 | @ Wisconsin | L 10–54 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 4 |  Lindenwood | W 29–3 | 7.9 | 6 | 80 | 13.3 | 1 | 21 |
| 5 | @ Massachusetts | W 38–14 | 6.5 | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 0 | 29 |
| 6 | @ Akron | W 25–23 | 6.8 | 4 | 36 | 9.0 | 1 | 14 |
| 7 |  Toledo | L 14–34 | 6.8 | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 1 | 12 |
| 8 | @ Ohio | L 20–24 | 5.9 | 3 | 30 | 10.0 | 0 | 13 |
| 2026 · 8 games | 6.5 | 34 | 367 | 10.8 | 4 | 34 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 2 | — |
| Yards | 9 | 1101st / 1519 |
| Yards / carry | 4.5 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 7 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 34 | 105th / 2089 |
| Yards | 367 | 170th / 2074 |
| Yards / catch | 10.8 | 325th / 460 |
| Touchdowns | 4 | 69th / 914 |
| Long | 34 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 1 | — |
| Lost | 1 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Sacramento State | ✓ WR | 68 | ~40 (26–49) | 3 | · | 59% |
| Wk 1 · San José State | ✓ WR | 68 | ~58 (38–68) | 10 | · | 85% |
| Wk 2 · Michigan State | ✓ WR | 52 | ~44 (29–52) | 6 | · | 85% |
| Wk 4 · Lindenwood | ✓ WR | 69 | ~59 (39–69) | 10 | · | 86% |
| Wk 5 · Massachusetts | ✓ WR | 68 | ~42 (28–51) | 6 | · | 62% |
| Wk 6 · Akron | — | 78 | ~65 (43–78) | 12 | · | 83% |
| Wk 7 · Toledo | ✓ WR | 71 | ~60 (39–71) | 9 | · | 85% |
| Wk 8 · Ohio | — | 68 | ~49 (32–60) | 5 | 1 | 72% |
| Season | 6 GS | 602 | 417 (350–486) | 61 | 1 | 69% |
Position Room
14 WRs on the Eastern Michigan roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Benson Prosper | WR | SR | 34 | 346 | 1 | 17% | +0.12 |
| 5 | Harold Mack | WR | SO | 34 | 367 | 4 | 19% | +0.34 |
| 2 | Nick Devereaux | WR | SR | 19 | 171 | 2 | 21% | +0.09 |
| 11 | Antonio Floyd | WR | JR | 7 | 52 | 0 | 8% | -0.20 |
| 85 | Kozy Isaac | WR | SO | 7 | 105 | 2 | 5% | +0.63 |
| 4 | Quinn Fracassi | WR | SR | 1 | 12 | 0 | 7% | +0.79 |
| 82 | Nate Lyman | WR | SO | 1 | 26 | 0 | 2% | +3.32 |
| Dalin Wilkins | WR | 1 | 15 | 0 | 6% | -0.37 | ||
| 18 | Mekhi Fox | WR | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 80 | Shawn Fishwick | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 83 | Bacori Minner | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 84 | JT Beasley | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 87 | CJ Miller | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | Carl Jean-Bart | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Eastern Michigan depth chart →